On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 08:48:08AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are getting quite out of context here but...
>
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Therein lies the beauty of mathematics. There are an uncountable
> > infinity of files whose sum is d41d8cd98f
Hello,
We are getting quite out of context here but...
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Therein lies the beauty of mathematics. There are an uncountable
> infinity of files whose sum is d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e :-)
Actually it is a countable infinity since files are fin
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:03:23PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:52:31PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps we can make use of some the recent research in the area of MD5
> > collisions :-)
> Only if you don't mind restricting yourself to files whose md5sum
On Thursday 15 September 2005 22:52, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:37:27PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:33:20PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:30:30PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> > > > W. Borgert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:52:31PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:37:27PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:33:20PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:30:30PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> > > > W. Borgert wr
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:37:27PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:33:20PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:30:30PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> > > W. Borgert wrote:
> > > > Back to your question: I personally hate files that are not
> >
On Thursday 15 September 2005 20:33, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
--cut--
> > I see nothing in Policy 6, Policy 10, or FHS which
> > answers the question, so either I am just not seeing it
> > or I am looking in the wrong place. If W.B. or others
> > wish to comment, I would be interested in what the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:33:20PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:30:30PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> > W. Borgert wrote:
> > > Back to your question: I personally hate files that are not
> > > under dpkg control, because you cannot check using debsums,
> > > dp
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:30:30PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> W. Borgert wrote:
> > Back to your question: I personally hate files that are not
> > under dpkg control, because you cannot check using debsums,
> > dpkg -L, dpkg -S, etc.
>
> This raises a topic I do not understand very well.
>
W. Borgert wrote:
> Back to your question: I personally hate files that are not
> under dpkg control, because you cannot check using debsums,
> dpkg -L, dpkg -S, etc.
This raises a topic I do not understand very well.
Since we are already on the topic, may I ask for further
advice?
Suppose that I
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:50:02AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear DD!
>
> I would like to have your comment on the following packaging decision:
>
> In packaging the cm-super fonts, i.e. repackaging the pts-tetex-cm-super
> package, we have two options:
>
> 1) Install all font files (*.pf
On Don, 15 Sep 2005, Simon Richter wrote:
> >2) Install a compressed definition file and create the pfb files
> > at package installation time, then deleting the definition file.
>
> Hrm, doesn't that happen automatically on first use?
No, this is done for the pk/tfm/mf files, but up to now *n
Hi,
Norbert Preining wrote:
2) Install a compressed definition file and create the pfb files
at package installation time, then deleting the definition file.
Hrm, doesn't that happen automatically on first use?
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:18:56AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> sarge or sid? THe problem now is that according to my mentor all the
> packages have to be build on sid. But since there are only a view bin
> packages I will make sarge and sid versions. Will see.
I am using sid. As sarge is alr
Hi Wolfgang!
On Don, 15 Sep 2005, W. Borgert wrote:
> > 1) Install all font files (*.pfb) as is
> >
> > 2) Install a compressed definition file and create the pfb files
> >at package installation time, then deleting the definition file.
>
> Welcome back from holidays! I will pester you with
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:50:02AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> In packaging the cm-super fonts, i.e. repackaging the pts-tetex-cm-super
> package, we have two options:
>
> 1) Install all font files (*.pfb) as is
>
> 2) Install a compressed definition file and create the pfb files
>at pack
Dear DD!
I would like to have your comment on the following packaging decision:
In packaging the cm-super fonts, i.e. repackaging the pts-tetex-cm-super
package, we have two options:
1) Install all font files (*.pfb) as is
2) Install a compressed definition file and create the pfb files
at
17 matches
Mail list logo
