Hi Ali,
Ali Mezgani writes:
> Hello,
>
> What is the issue, if you need a new contributor I should do. What are
> blocking phases?
>
Sorry, I missed your email and don't understand what you mean. Do you
mean you'd like to package the "New Session Manager" fork (fltk port)?
Thanks,
Nicholas
Hi,
"rosea.grammostola" writes:
> To be more precise: non-session-manager is forked. That fork
> (new-session-manager) can be build without NTK.
>
> Non-Daw with non-sequencer/non-timeline/non-mixer isn't forked and still
> needs the NTK toolkit (fork of fltk).
>
Hmm, maybe I should prioritis
Hi Rosea,
"rosea.grammostola" writes:
> Project has been forked, I've no interest in packaging it, but it should
> be easier now with plain FLTK instead of NTK
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965068
>
Thank you for the link. Yes, and with meson replacing the waf evil :-)
To be more precise: non-session-manager is forked. That fork
(new-session-manager) can be build without NTK.
Non-Daw with non-sequencer/non-timeline/non-mixer isn't forked and still
needs the NTK toolkit (fork of fltk).
On 7/21/20 7:14 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Project has been forked, I'v
Project has been forked, I've no interest in packaging it, but it should
be easier now with plain FLTK instead of NTK
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965068
On 7/21/20 6:23 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Hi Rosea,
Sorry for the long delay in replying. I lost the thread and i
Hello,
What is the issue, if you need a new contributor I should do. What are
blocking phases?
Regards,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 17:24 Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi Rosea,
>
> Sorry for the long delay in replying. I lost the thread and it took me
> this long to think "say, I wonder what happe
Hi Rosea,
Sorry for the long delay in replying. I lost the thread and it took me
this long to think "say, I wonder what happened with that new
contributor who wants to work on NON?"
"rosea.grammostola" writes:
> Nicholas and others,
>
> Ha, I didn't solve anything man. I'm probably the most un
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:35:17PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> > > If you just want to package non-session-manager, why not:
> > > 1. Download the tarball from here:
> > > https://git.tuxfamily.org/non/non.git/tag/?id=non-session-manager-v1.2.0
> > > (or the github mirror - whichever is best)
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:02:03PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> > how did you
> > resolve the NTK-fork dep and the waf evil?
>
> About he Waf evil, upstream developer told me this:
>
> "There was an issue a while I ago that I fixed related to how unique the
> shipped WAF binary is. I think i
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:11:04PM -0600, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> src:non (or src:non-daw) would generate
> bin:non-{timeline,sequencer,mixer,session-manager}. Andrey, is the
> simplest method still debian/bin-pkg-name0.install and
> debian/bin-pkg-name1.install + simple glob patterns, and/or
On 3/9/20 10:11 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
how did you
resolve the NTK-fork dep and the waf evil?
About he Waf evil, upstream developer told me this:
"There was an issue a while I ago that I fixed related to how unique the
shipped WAF binary is. I think it should be in a good place now t
Nicholas and others,
Ha, I didn't solve anything man. I'm probably the most unclassified
person for the job. But hey, if no one wants to do it, you've to do it
yourself isn't it? Which I can't so that's why I'm asking these 'stupid'
newbie questions on this list. Sure there are all kind of obs
Hi,
Rosea, thank you for working on Non! Out of curiosity, how did you
resolve the NTK-fork dep and the waf evil? If it wouldn't be too much
trouble, would you please generate bin packages for the full suite? I'm
personally interested in the Timeline, Mixer, and Session manager, and I
have a fr
On 3/9/20 9:30 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:58:26PM +0100, Ross Gammon wrote:
If you just want to package non-session-manager, why not:
1. Download the tarball from here:
https://git.tuxfamily.org/non/non.git/tag/?id=non-session-manager-v1.2.0
(or the github mirror
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:58:26PM +0100, Ross Gammon wrote:
> If you just want to package non-session-manager, why not:
> 1. Download the tarball from here:
> https://git.tuxfamily.org/non/non.git/tag/?id=non-session-manager-v1.2.0
> (or the github mirror - whichever is best)
That's just a snapsho
Hi Rosea,
On 09/03/2020 16:37, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:20:26PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>>> You just need to create a source tarball that is able to build the project
>>> you need. For that you'll need to find out which common files are also
>>> needed.
>>> Yo
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:20:26PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> > You just need to create a source tarball that is able to build the project
> > you need. For that you'll need to find out which common files are also
> > needed.
> > You'll need to do it manually each time you need to upload a n
On 3/9/20 2:55 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
You just need to create a source tarball that is able to build the project
you need. For that you'll need to find out which common files are also
needed.
You'll need to do it manually each time you need to upload a new version,
so I guess you'll want
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:26:49PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>
> On 3/9/20 2:11 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > You can build each project independently.
> > It doesn't matter.
> > If you are able to split this repo into separate source packages, do it,
> >
> That's probably the best op
On 3/9/20 2:11 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
You can build each project independently.
It doesn't matter.
If you are able to split this repo into separate source packages, do it,
That's probably the best option then. But what if upstream doesn't want
to split it, how do I split it 'according
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 01:07:34PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> > > This git repo contains four packages, but I only want to package one. How
> > > to
> > > deal with this situation via git-buildpackage? (Upstream sources kept in
> > > the
> > > upstream branch and the the debian in the mast
On 3/9/20 12:56 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:18:04AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
This git repo contains four packages, but I only want to package one. How to
deal with this situation via git-buildpackage? (Upstream sources kept in the
upstream branch and th
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:18:04AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This git repo contains four packages, but I only want to package one. How to
> deal with this situation via git-buildpackage? (Upstream sources kept in the
> upstream branch and the the debian in the master branch)
>
> h
Hi,
This git repo contains four packages, but I only want to package one.
How to deal with this situation via git-buildpackage? (Upstream sources
kept in the upstream branch and the the debian in the master branch)
https://git.tuxfamily.org/non/non.git/
Regards,
\r
24 matches
Mail list logo
