On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:59:45AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:29:14AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> > If I have a package that changed its name because of upstream
> > maintainer's choice, should I merge new and old changelogs or what?
>
> I'd do that.
Me too, I tho
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:59:45AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:29:14AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> > If I have a package that changed its name because of upstream
> > maintainer's choice, should I merge new and old changelogs or what?
>
> I'd do that.
Me too, I th
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:29:14AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> If I have a package that changed its name because of upstream
> maintainer's choice, should I merge new and old changelogs or what?
I'd do that.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
If I have a package that changed its name because of upstream
maintainer's choice, should I merge new and old changelogs or what?
TIA
Christian
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FLUG: http://www.firenze.linux.it | Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
"It
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:29:14AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> If I have a package that changed its name because of upstream
> maintainer's choice, should I merge new and old changelogs or what?
I'd do that.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
If I have a package that changed its name because of upstream
maintainer's choice, should I merge new and old changelogs or what?
TIA
Christian
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FLUG: http://www.firenze.linux.it | Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
"It
6 matches
Mail list logo