On 2004-04-07 Erik Bourget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[adding users]
> > adduser is the correct tool. See policy 9.2.2.
> > I do not think that useradd follows, e.g., the uid allocation guidelines in
> > that section, and adduser's semantics are more c
On 2004-04-07 Erik Bourget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[adding users]
> > adduser is the correct tool. See policy 9.2.2.
> > I do not think that useradd follows, e.g., the uid allocation guidelines in
> > that section, and adduser's semantics are more c
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 03:45:46PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:18:20AM -0400, Erik Bourget wrote:
> > What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian system?
> > I have a daemon that has no need to run as root (but a need to store its own
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 03:45:46PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:18:20AM -0400, Erik Bourget wrote:
> > What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian system?
> > I have a daemon that has no need to run as root (but a need to store its own
On 2004-04-06 Erik Bourget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian
> system?
Policy 9.2.
| Packages which need a user or group, but can have this user or
| group allocated dynamically and differently on each system, should
| use adduser --s
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:18, Erik Bourget wrote:
> What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian system?
> I have a daemon that has no need to run as root (but a need to store its own
> datafiles, etc, so nobody is out) and would like to have it run under a user
> account. G
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:18:20AM -0400, Erik Bourget wrote:
>
>
> What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian system?
> I have a daemon that has no need to run as root (but a need to store its own
> datafiles, etc, so nobody is out) and would like to have it run under a
On 2004-04-06 Erik Bourget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian
> system?
Policy 9.2.
| Packages which need a user or group, but can have this user or
| group allocated dynamically and differently on each system, should
| use adduser --s
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:18, Erik Bourget wrote:
> What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian system?
> I have a daemon that has no need to run as root (but a need to store its own
> datafiles, etc, so nobody is out) and would like to have it run under a user
> account. G
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:18:20AM -0400, Erik Bourget wrote:
>
>
> What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian system?
> I have a daemon that has no need to run as root (but a need to store its own
> datafiles, etc, so nobody is out) and would like to have it run under a
Hello;
What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian system?
I have a daemon that has no need to run as root (but a need to store its own
datafiles, etc, so nobody is out) and would like to have it run under a user
account. Gerrit Pape's qmail package does an ugly
hit-cont
11 matches
Mail list logo