Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
It was 2003-03-23 21:56 when Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written... > > > Darren Salt wrote: > License : GNU Public Licence > >>> You *could* of course spell that correctly... > >> There are no _spelling_ errors there. > > While there are no

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written... > Darren Salt wrote: License : GNU Public Licence >>> You *could* of course spell that correctly... >> There are no _spelling_ errors there. > While there are no words mispelled, What? There's one, right there :-) > the *

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
It was 2003-03-23 21:56 when Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written... > > > Darren Salt wrote: > License : GNU Public Licence > >>> You *could* of course spell that correctly... > >> There are no _spelling_ errors there. > > While there are no

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written... > Darren Salt wrote: License : GNU Public Licence >>> You *could* of course spell that correctly... >> There are no _spelling_ errors there. > While there are no words mispelled, What? There's one, right there :-) > the *

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 08:16:18PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote: > > I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written... > > Demand? An odd choice of words. "We don't demand solid facts! What we demand is a total absence of

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Darren Salt wrote: >>>License : GNU Public Licence >>You *could* of course spell that correctly... > There are no _spelling_ errors there. While there are no words mispelled, the *name* of the license (or licence) is. Just because my name is spelled as Tomas with or without various acce

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written... Demand? An odd choice of words. > > On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > >> License : GNU Public Licence > > > You *could* of course spell that correctly...

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 08:16:18PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote: > > I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written... > > Demand? An odd choice of words. "We don't demand solid facts! What we demand is a total absence of

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written... > On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> License : GNU Public Licence > You *could* of course spell that correctly... There are no _spelling_ errors there. > (Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.)

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Darren Salt wrote: >>>License : GNU Public Licence >>You *could* of course spell that correctly... > There are no _spelling_ errors there. While there are no words mispelled, the *name* of the license (or licence) is. Just because my name is spelled as Tomas with or without various acce

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written... Demand? An odd choice of words. > > On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > >> License : GNU Public Licence > > > You *could* of course spell that correctly...

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-23 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written... > On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> License : GNU Public Licence > You *could* of course spell that correctly... There are no _spelling_ errors there. > (Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.)

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-22 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > License : GNU Public Licence You *could* of course spell that correctly... (Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.) -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% Taiteellisen ohjelmoinnin ystäv

Re: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-22 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > License : GNU Public Licence You *could* of course spell that correctly... (Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.) -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% Taiteellisen ohjelmoinnin ystäv

out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-21 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
I'm not Debian developer but I maintain few packages outside. Main package is rox (ROX-Filer). Some time ago new version (3.5.9) of Debian policy came out and version 3.5.6 is marked as 'out of date'. After checking upgrading-checklist.txt I don't know clearly if I can bump it or not - can some

out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6

2003-03-21 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
I'm not Debian developer but I maintain few packages outside. Main package is rox (ROX-Filer). Some time ago new version (3.5.9) of Debian policy came out and version 3.5.6 is marked as 'out of date'. After checking upgrading-checklist.txt I don't know clearly if I can bump it or not - can some