On 2020-06-11 15:35 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Looks like what you haven't isn't correct, it should be libzmat1
> instead of libzmat in the control file, since the library package name
> is supposed to be based on the SONAME of the library.
Are you sure you are not being excessively categorical her
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 02:53 -0400, Qianqian Fang wrote:
> that's possible. however, some of the file release systems, such as
> MATLAB File Exchange, only links to the github generated
> master.zip/release packages. if I remove the mex files from my github
> folder, users will not be able to run u
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 02:53:47AM -0400, Qianqian Fang wrote:
>
> when dh builds the library, the linking command of the libzmat.so file did
> include the -lz flag (and the linking was successful)
>
> gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libzmat.so.1 -lz -o ../lib/libzmat.so zmatlib.o
With --as-needed e
On 6/11/20 2:05 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
The Depends in debian/control are not the same as the dependencies of
the library file itself (although usually the library dependencies are
automatically translated to Depends using ${shlibs:Depends}). When
linking the library you need to link against libz.so
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 01:52 -0400, Qianqian Fang wrote:
> I listed zlib1g in the Depends section, isn't it the provider of libz.so?
The Depends in debian/control are not the same as the dependencies of
the library file itself (although usually the library dependencies are
automatically translated
On 6/11/20 12:52 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:25 PM Qianqian Fang wrote:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol deflateBound used by
debian/libzmat1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzmat.so.1 found in none of the
libraries
although, I've already added zlib1g-dev to Build-Depends and zl
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:25 PM Qianqian Fang wrote:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol deflateBound used by
> debian/libzmat1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzmat.so.1 found in none of the
> libraries
>
> although, I've already added zlib1g-dev to Build-Depends and zlib1g to the
> Depends fields, I
hi there,
I am learning my way towards creating my first Debian package. The
specific package I am working on right now is in this ITP bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962603
at this point, I've uploaded a set of packaging files to salsa
https://salsa.debian.org/
Hi!,
Congrats on your first package and welcome to Debian!
https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyfltk
>
> If you see on QA Information you will see that there are some litian
problems,
please check if that problems exist on testing too and try to solve it.
Do you have salsa user? it would great
Looking for a sponsor.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyfltk
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:13 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:58 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> > Hurray! I built it.
>
> Congrats! Please also check the package with lintian.
>
Will do.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:58 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Hurray! I built it.
Congrats! Please also check the package with lintian.
> How do I sign the dsc and changes files with gpg before uploading to
> mentors site with dput.
The intro guide should document that, but it should be enough to r
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:15 PM Paul Wise wrote:
...
> Once the package is ready, you can upload it to the mentors site and
> ask for a sponsor. If you have any questions while creating the
> package, you can ask them on this list or on the #debian-mentors IRC
> channel.
>
> https://mentors.debian.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:57 PM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:15 PM Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
> > > the package. However, the final step
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:15 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
> > the package. However, the final step debuild -us -uc fails
> > with an error message stating that the source
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> I'm hoping someone can help me co-maintain it or help me get this
> package accepted. For your information I am a high school CS teacher
> in Canada who uses python fltk to teach gui programming. It's a lot
> easier to tell my students to
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
> the package. However, the final step debuild -us -uc fails
> with an error message stating that the source package has two
> conflicting values: pyfltk and python3-fl
Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
the package. However, the final step debuild -us -uc fails
with an error message stating that the source package has two
conflicting values: pyfltk and python3-fltk.
I have uploaded the package source to
https://bitbucket.org/r
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 4:02 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> which conserves the main important parts of history without any
> hassle to deal with archived svn.
This will drop commit messages and any changes that weren't uploaded.
Personally, I never found dealing with local subversion databases any
has
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:48:38PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> of the repository to git and continue from there. You can also skip
> the conversion and just checkout the latest svn revision and continue
> from there.
May be its easier and in the end more sensible to create a Git archive
via
gbp
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 2:36 PM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> The package used to be in debian before but has been orphaned.
When reintroducing packages, there are some extra steps to perform in
addition to the ones done when adding new packages:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-referen
Hi I am trying to create a debian package and submit it before the
Buster Feb 12 soft freeze.
The package used to be in debian before but has been orphaned. The package is
python-fltk
I am in the process of learning how to build the package. I found a
previous xenial ubuntu package here
https:
Hello,
> W: vpcs source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.2)
This lintian message don't come out by Alexey Eromenko.
I would say Alexey Eromenko uses Debian lenny for compiling. But it should
be wheezy or sid. That should be background for the different of lintian
differences.
Hi!
Am 20.01.2012 10:59, schrieb Alex Mestiashvili:
> It seems to me that your lintian is rather old .
> IMO it is always better to use lintian from sid .
... or just the one from backports.debian.org
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o
On 01/20/2012 10:48 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
>> pabs@chianamo ~ $ cat ~/.lintianrc
>> info=yes
>> display-info=yes
>> display-experimental=yes
>> pedantic=yes
>> show-overrides=yes
>> color=auto
>>
>>
> I have copied your file, but now I get this:
>
> user@xrig:/vm/tmp/vpcs-0.3$ lintian ../v
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> I have copied your file, but now I get this:
>
> user@xrig:/vm/tmp/vpcs-0.3$ lintian ../vpcs_0.3-1_amd64.deb
> syntax error in configuration file: info=yes
I get no such error, hmmm.
Also, you should run lintian on the .changes file so th
> pabs@chianamo ~ $ cat ~/.lintianrc
> info=yes
> display-info=yes
> display-experimental=yes
> pedantic=yes
> show-overrides=yes
> color=auto
>
I have copied your file, but now I get this:
user@xrig:/vm/tmp/vpcs-0.3$ lintian ../vpcs_0.3-1_amd64.deb
syntax error in configuration file: info=yes
--
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> Standard lintian gives me no errors, but only few warnings:
...
> Why so huge diff ?
pabs@chianamo ~ $ cat ~/.lintianrc
info=yes
display-info=yes
display-experimental=yes
pedantic=yes
show-overrides=yes
color=auto
--
bye,
pabs
http://wi
> These are lintian warnings which should be fixed:
>
> W: vpcs source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/vpcs.doc-base.EX
> W: vpcs source: format-3.0-but-debian-changes-patch
> W: vpcs source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.2)
> W: vpcs: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> W:
On 01/20/2012 06:27 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> GREAT news: I'm ready to upload my first Debian package !
>
> Link: (source + amd64 binary)
> http://forum.gns3.net/post14018.html
>
> =
>
> NAME
>vpcs - A light-weight network virtual pc simulat
GREAT news: I'm ready to upload my first Debian package !
Link: (source + amd64 binary)
http://forum.gns3.net/post14018.html
=
NAME
vpcs - A light-weight network virtual pc simulator.
DESCRIPTION
The VPCS can simulate up to 9 PCs. You can ping/traceroute
them, or
Hi!
Your package only contains a JAR file with binary files. You should
compile the Java source files yourself instead.
I have no experience with Java packages myself so I can not help you
there. I found some information about Building Java Packages in
Debian[1] by the Debian Java Packaging Pro
> I'm trying for the first time to get a package into the offical
> debian-repository. You can find it here:
> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=jondo
> . Any feedback about this package are welcome!
Welcome to Debian packaging. The first step in getting
Hi,
I'm trying for the first time to get a package into the offical
debian-repository. You can find it here:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=jondo
. Any feedback about this package are welcome!
regards
Rorschach
--
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pgp:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 11:09, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> You're using PDF as *source*? How come?
>
I am now using the latex file as source.
>
> Why don't you simply check some packages that contain binary files?
>
> `apt-get source asc-music`
>
What a wonderful idea! I have never downloade
On Sun, 08 May 2005 13:17:32 +0200
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 May 2005 10:23:19 -0400
> > "Brenda J. Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Anyway your case is clearly different, your source is a kpr file
> > not a pdf one.
> >
> >
> >>If not,
Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Thu, 05 May 2005 10:23:19 -0400
> "Brenda J. Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyway your case is clearly different, your source is a kpr file not
> a pdf one.
>
>
>>If not, then how should I proceed? I can put the .kpr, .ps and .pdf
>>in the package... I could pl
On Thu, 05 May 2005 10:23:19 -0400
"Brenda J. Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:22:28PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote:
> > > I have written an advanced debian tutorial and decided to try to
>
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:22:28PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote:
> > I have written an advanced debian tutorial and decided to try to build a
> > debian package from it. I used the pdf format as source and, after reading
> > t
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:22:28PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote:
> I have written an advanced debian tutorial and decided to try to build a
> debian package from it. I used the pdf format as source and, after reading
> the maintainer stuff, tried to build the package thinking it would be easy
> sin
Mauro Darida wrote:
> Currently there is no top level Makefile. This may require additional tuning.
> Done. Please edit the files in the debian/ subdirectory now. You should also
> check that the debianadv Makefiles install into $DESTDIR and not in / .
This is an important warning. If you understa
Hello debian superusers,
I have written an advanced debian tutorial and decided to try to build a
debian package from it. I used the pdf format as source and, after reading
the maintainer stuff, tried to build the package thinking it would be easy
since there are no dependencies.
Unfortunately I
42 matches
Mail list logo
