Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-26 Thread Joey Hess
Domenico Andreoli wrote: > debstd (i hate it, it is stupid) wants to debianize all packages you are > building *at once*. so when i build the first binary package (say the > plain one) it tryes to debianize also the ssl one (which i have not > even built yet!). > > > i think debstd would be mor

RE: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-23 Thread arto . astala
When non-US was divided into non-US/main etc. it was decreed, that /main & non-US/main together are the free part, as determined by license. Placement into /main or non-US/main is determined by export control laws which have no bearing on licenses. So it is perfectly permissible to have in /main a

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 06:11:59PM -0400, James Mastros wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 01:55:33AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > Apart from that, isn't there a non-US problem with the SSL support ? Take > > > care not to install in main somet

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-17 Thread goswin . brederlow
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i'm trying to package curl. curl is tool to download anything from > the net in all sort of ways (http, ftp, gopher, https). it comes > also with ssl support, i can tell it to compile ssl support by a switch > after ./configure. > > in order to get

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-16 Thread James Mastros
On Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 01:55:33AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Apart from that, isn't there a non-US problem with the SSL support ? Take > > care not to install in main something that could not be exported by US > > residents. > right, i have to

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 01:55:33AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli écrivait: > > care not to install in main something that could not be exported by US > > residents. > right, i have to break source in two anyway. i can't put source in main > distribution that require some non-US packages, can i? No. Ch

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-15 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Why don't take a look a other sources building many packages ? Vim was > listed as an example ... you may want to take a look at perl-5.005 too. > > That's the best source of information in general, look what has already > been done. i took apache-

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-14 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > Curl is already packaged and available for potato. If you are > packaging this for your own edification, you can take a look at this > package to see how it was done. > http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/non-us/curl.html > i know, i took over th

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-14 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 09:36:22PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli écrivait: > in order to get both version i have to configure/make sources (for > plain version), save somewhere plain binary and clean reconfigure/remake > all (for ssl flavour). > > well, multiple binary packages support goes well when w

Re: multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-14 Thread Gopal Narayanan
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 09:36:22PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > i'm trying to package curl. curl is tool to download anything from > the net in all sort of ways (http, ftp, gopher, https). it comes > also with ssl support, i can tell it to compile ssl support by a switch > after ./configure

multiple binary packages (again)

1999-08-14 Thread Domenico Andreoli
i'm trying to package curl. curl is tool to download anything from the net in all sort of ways (http, ftp, gopher, https). it comes also with ssl support, i can tell it to compile ssl support by a switch after ./configure. in order to get both version i have to configure/make sources (for plain v