Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:56:28 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:27 [RC] -- several GNU manual pages
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043573,
regarding RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:27 [RC] -- several GNU manual pages
to be marked as done.
This means
gcc-doc-base - several GNU manual pages
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-doc-defaults/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.de
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 04:31:56PM +0100, wf...@niif.hu wrote:
> See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966803#14:
> if you want to *emit* a backslash, use \e.
Thank you very much!
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Mar
nd each '\' in the string
> converted to '\\'.
>
> which looks reasonable enough.
>
> However lintian doesn't like this and flags the construct with
> "acute-accent-in-manual-page". Is this a bug in Lintian?
Lintian is honorably losing against nroff
Hi,
How would I quote backslashes in a manual page correctly?
Currently I have the source:
with '"' around each argument, each '"'
in the string converted to '\\"' and each '\\' in the string
converted to ''.
This renders to:
with '"' around each argument, each '"'
in the string converted
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:23:51 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: cppman/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- C++ 98/11 manual pages
for Linux, with source from cplusplus.com
has caused the Debian Bug report #734726,
regarding RFS: cppman/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- C++ 98/11 manual pages for
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for sponsor for my package "cppman". Since this package is
a python application, I set the maintainer to Python Applications
Packaging Team. Please help to review this package for any problem,
thanks.
The following is p
imple scripts from question above.
> Are manual pages useful for them? What maintainers usually do in such cases?
I kinda like the position recently mentioned on #-devel: "you need a
manpage for that? really? You know what? WRITE IT. Upstream accepts
patches."
Of course YMMV if you need sp
s. (For example, they do not react to --help or --version
> arguments.) These can be GUI programs or simple scripts from question above.
> Are manual pages useful for them? What maintainers usually do in such
> cases?
Just add a minimal "--help" option to the program and then use
binaries)?
Also there is another question about scripts or programs which do not use
command line arguments. (For example, they do not react to --help or --version
arguments.) These can be GUI programs or simple scripts from question above.
Are manual pages useful for them? What maintainers usually
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 16:09 +0100 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
> I have one other question.
> Program have no options.
> Is there some standard way how to fill SYNOPSIS and OPTIONS sections
> e.g. "program has no option" or should I just delete them?
First: manual pages are
Jaromír Mike¹ writes:
> Thanks to all it helped.
>
> Btw having this error messages on $sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
>
> dpkg-source -b jnoise-0.4.0
> dpkg-source: building jnoise using existing jnoise_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: building jnoise in jnoise_0.4.0-1.diff.gz
> dpkg-source: cannot r
Hello,
I have one other question.
Program have no options.
Is there some standard way how to fill SYNOPSIS and OPTIONS sections
e.g. "program has no option" or should I just delete them?
regards
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Thanks to all it helped.
Btw having this error messages on $sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
dpkg-source -b jnoise-0.4.0
dpkg-source: building jnoise using existing jnoise_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building jnoise in jnoise_0.4.0-1.diff.gz
dpkg-source: cannot represent change
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:00:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:53 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > having problem to build package with manual pages.
> > I edited and rename manpage.1.ex > jnoise.1
> > Also uncomment line "dh_installman&q
> Od: Barry deFreese < href="mailto:bdefre...@verizon.net";>bdefre...@verizon.net>
> > Btw having this error messages on $sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
> >
> > dpkg-source -b jnoise-0.4.0
> > dpkg-source: building jnoise using existing jnoise_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
> > dpkg-source: building jnoise in jnois
Od: Barry deFreese
> Btw having this error messages on $sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
>
> dpkg-source -b jnoise-0.4.0
> dpkg-source: building jnoise using existing jnoise_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: building jnoise in jnoise_0.4.0-1.diff.gz
> dpkg-source: cannot represent change to .Makefile.
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:24:11PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Thanks to all it helped.
>
> Btw having this error messages on $sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
>
> dpkg-source -b jnoise-0.4.0
> dpkg-source: building jnoise using existing jnoise_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: building jnoise in jn
Thanks to all it helped.
Btw having this error messages on $sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
dpkg-source -b jnoise-0.4.0
dpkg-source: building jnoise using existing jnoise_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building jnoise in jnoise_0.4.0-1.diff.gz
dpkg-source: cannot represent change to .Makefile.swp: bin
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
having problem to build package with manual pages.
I edited and rename manpage.1.ex > jnoise.1
Also uncomment line "dh_installman" in debian/rules "binary-indep" section
But when I install package there are not man pages,also lintian complain
Le Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:00:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
> >
> You need to add debian/jnoise.1 into debian/packagename.manpages. If it
> doesn't exist, create it.
And also to submit your manpage upstream, so that in the next release you do
not have to care about manpages anymore.
Have
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:53 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello,
>
> having problem to build package with manual pages.
> I edited and rename manpage.1.ex > jnoise.1
> Also uncomment line "dh_installman" in debian/rules "binary-indep" section
>
>
Hello,
having problem to build package with manual pages.
I edited and rename manpage.1.ex > jnoise.1
Also uncomment line "dh_installman" in debian/rules "binary-indep" section
But when I install package there are not man pages,also lintian complain ...
W: jnoise: bin
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:30:26PM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
> i cant get the man page installed properly:
> i first did the routine manually to check for errors, thats what i did:
> 1. edited the sgml template created by dh_make, calledo it minido.sgml,
> 2. created the minido.1 with docboo
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:30:26PM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
> i cant get the man page installed properly:
> i first did the routine manually to check for errors, thats what i did:
> 1. edited the sgml template created by dh_make, calledo it minido.sgml,
> 2. created the minido.1 with docboo
hi all,
i am building up a deb package i still have only one error:
i cant get the man page installed properly:
i first did the routine manually to check for errors, thats what i did:
1. edited the sgml template created by dh_make, calledo it minido.sgml,
2. created the minido.1 with docbook-to-ma
hi all,
i am building up a deb package i still have only one error:
i cant get the man page installed properly:
i first did the routine manually to check for errors, thats what i did:
1. edited the sgml template created by dh_make, calledo it minido.sgml,
2. created the minido.1 with docbook-to-ma
27 matches
Mail list logo
