Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Do you have CDPATH set? If so, this is a bug in lintian that's already > fixed in Subversion. Yes I have, after removing this variable all warnings disappeared :) Thanks. My gaupol package is lintian clean again :) Can anyone upload it? -- -=[ Piotr Ozaro

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What does "manpage-has-errors-from-man" warning mean? > After upgrading my lintian from 1.23.15 to 1.23.16 > I'm getting this warning _every_ _time_ I check a package that has a > manpage. > Is this a lintian bug? Should I report it on BTS? Do you ha

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Do you perchance have the -v flag in the GZIP environment variable, or > are passing it to gzip (and gunzip) by default somehow? Because if this > is the case, then lintian will consider the output of gzip (something > like "file: 80.2% -- etc, etc") as a

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Piotr Ozarowski wrote: >Andrea Bolognani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >>It means the man page is not correct. >>See http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tmanpage-has-errors-from-man.html >> >> > >But I'm not getting "cannot adjust", "can't break" or "can't find >numbered character". All I get is: >

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:54:01 +0200 Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > KiyuKo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > My version of lintian (1.23.8) doesn't give any error while checking > > lintian_1.23.16_all.deb, so if you have an up-to-date version of lintian > > it's very likely the bug is in lintia

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
KiyuKo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > My version of lintian (1.23.8) doesn't give any error while checking > lintian_1.23.16_all.deb, so if you have an up-to-date version of lintian it's > very likely the bug is in lintian itself. > > Have you tried checking the package with linda instead? Linda (lintian

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread KiyuKo
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:32:49 +0200 Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrea Bolognani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > It means the man page is not correct. > > See http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tmanpage-has-errors-from-man.html > > But I'm not getting "cannot adjust", "can't break" or "can

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Andrea Bolognani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > It means the man page is not correct. > See http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tmanpage-has-errors-from-man.html But I'm not getting "cannot adjust", "can't break" or "can't find numbered character". All I get is: $ lintian ./gaupol_0.4.0-1_all.deb /tmp/eOvx

Re: lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 22:59:04 +0200 Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does "manpage-has-errors-from-man" warning mean? > After upgrading my lintian from 1.23.15 to 1.23.16 > I'm getting this warning _every_ _time_ I check a package that has a > manpage. > > Is this a lintian bug? Sh

lintian warning problem, RFS: gaupol

2006-04-02 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
What does "manpage-has-errors-from-man" warning mean? After upgrading my lintian from 1.23.15 to 1.23.16 I'm getting this warning _every_ _time_ I check a package that has a manpage. Is this a lintian bug? Should I report it on BTS? BTW: I'm still looking for sponsor for gaupol (ITP bug #358189)