Andreas Voegele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Should I call the binary package gtksheet0 or libgtksheet0?
>
> dh_make suggests libgtksheet0, but there's already a package called
> gtkglarea4, so IMO gtksheet0 fits in better.
It doesn't seem to be policy, but just about all Debian packages of
I'd like to package the GtkSheet widget library and have two
questions.
1. Should I call the binary package gtksheet0 or libgtksheet0?
dh_make suggests libgtksheet0, but there's already a package called
gtkglarea4, so IMO gtksheet0 fits in better.
2. Should the development package depend on libg
> On 21 May 1998 00:30:11 -0500, Rob Tillotson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Rob> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello again, and thanks for
Rob> your quick responses to my last queries. I have two questions
Rob> tonight, both relating to a package I have just adopted. The
Rob> package i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello again, and thanks for your quick responses to my last queries.
I have two questions tonight, both relating to a package I have just
adopted. The package in question is objpak, a library of Objective-C
classes. The previous debianized version is very old,
4 matches
Mail list logo