RE: library packaging problem

2004-08-24 Thread mzenker
Hi, I have solved my problem of empty .debs in a library package: in the debian/rules file, I had to change the install command from $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp to read $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr so that dh_movefiles could move the files into debian//usr/

RE: library packaging problem

2004-08-24 Thread mzenker
Hi, I have solved my problem of empty .debs in a library package: in the debian/rules file, I had to change the install command from $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp to read $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr so that dh_movefiles could move the files into debian//usr/

RE: library packaging problem

2004-08-24 Thread mzenker
Below is the output of dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot. Perhaps anyone can see what went wrong? Thank you, Matthias ---OUTPUT BEGIN dpkg-buildpackage: source package is libulxmlrpcpp dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.4.5-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Matthias Zenk

RE: library packaging problem

2004-08-24 Thread mzenker
gt; From: Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 8:41 PM > To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) > Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: library packaging problem > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: library packaging problem

2004-08-24 Thread mzenker
gt; From: Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 8:41 PM > To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: library packaging problem > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [2

Re: library packaging problem

2004-08-23 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]: > Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly > trivial) error? Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard time guessing. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: library packaging problem

2004-08-23 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]: > Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly trivial) > error? Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard time guessing. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

library packaging problem

2004-08-23 Thread mzenker
Hi, I am trying to package a library. This is my first package (yes, I know that it is depreciated for packaging newbies, but I need it in my job...). I have used upstream .tar.gz sources (they use autoconf and automake) and tried to follow the new maintainer's guide. The problem is that the d

library packaging problem

2004-08-23 Thread mzenker
Hi, I am trying to package a library. This is my first package (yes, I know that it is depreciated for packaging newbies, but I need it in my job...). I have used upstream .tar.gz sources (they use autoconf and automake) and tried to follow the new maintainer's guide. The problem is that the d