Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
>> > > means.
>
> In another mail, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
> [...]
>>
On 05/01/02 03:36:11 +0200 Christian Marillat wrote:
"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Can you translate ?
http://www.goenglish.com/2014.asp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
>> "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
>> > > means.
> In another mail, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
> [
On 05/01/02 03:36:11 +0200 Christian Marillat wrote:
>>> "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Pot. Kettle. Black.
>
> Can you translate ?
http://www.goenglish.com/2014.asp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>> "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
>> > > means.
> In another mail, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
>
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
> > > means.
In another mail, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
[...]
> Obtaining permission is just a matter of courtesy.
Pot.
Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and
> non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where)
And? Nobody said the contrary. Jérôme simply said that software that
can't be distributed is non-free software, which is (was?) th
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
> > > means.
In another mail, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
[...]
> Obtaining permission is just a matter of courtesy.
Pot.
Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and
> non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where)
And? Nobody said the contrary. Jérôme simply said that software that
can't be distributed is non-free software, which is (was?) t
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 02:25:35PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> It seems you have different ideas; I am not losing my sleep on this.
Don't worry, I know who I'm talking to ;-)
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
it seems we have very different opinions; for me...
... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and
non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where)
... upstream authors should be listened to (after all, they do most of
the job), and
... courtesy is not an option (at l
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> What Christian Marillat has been doing was surely done with good intentions
> in mind; and indeed I have already asked him for any help he wishes to
> provide; but there were some problems/issues.
>
> (btw: didn't you ask yourself
hi
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
...
> Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on
> reinventing packaging that has already been done by
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 02:25:35PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> It seems you have different ideas; I am not losing my sleep on this.
Don't worry, I know who I'm talking to ;-)
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
it seems we have very different opinions; for me...
... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and
non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where)
... upstream authors should be listened to (after all, they do most of
the job), and
... courtesy is not an option (at
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> What Christian Marillat has been doing was surely done with good intentions
> in mind; and indeed I have already asked him for any help he wishes to
> provide; but there were some problems/issues.
>
> (btw: didn't you ask yourself
hi
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
...
> Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on
> reinventing packaging that has already been done by
>
>> "JM" == Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> hi
>>
>> I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
>> I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
>> that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi
>
> I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
> I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
> that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
> libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should
On Saturday 27 April 2002 16:32, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
> I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
> that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
> libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we sho
hi
I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put in
Depends and Build-depends fields.
thanks
a.
>> "JM" == Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> hi
>>
>> I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
>> I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
>> that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is n
Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi
>
> I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
> I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
> that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
> libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we shoul
On Saturday 27 April 2002 16:32, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
> I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
> that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
> libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we sh
hi
I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl;
I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard
that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put in
Depends and Build-depends fields.
thanks
a.
25 matches
Mail list logo
