Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Should we ask Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to sync those .ex files with > Lintian ? > actually he should sync them with debhelper.

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Should we ask Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to sync those .ex files with > Lintian ? > actually he should sync them with debhelper. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-04 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:17:36AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > >> This is no different from working with a bunch of coders and everyone > >> agreeing > >> on a common code formatting. > > > > Talk to the maintainer of debhelper ? > > > > dh_make is NOT maintained by Joey Hess, the d

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-04 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:17:36AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > >> This is no different from working with a bunch of coders and everyone > >> agreeing > >> on a common code formatting. > > > > Talk to the maintainer of debhelper ? > > > > dh_make is NOT maintained by Joey Hess, the

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Christian Surchi
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:17:36AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > Talk to the maintainer of debhelper ? > > dh_make is NOT maintained by Joey Hess, the debhelper maint. In fact he has > nothing to do with it. Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or file a bug against it. -- Christian Surchi |

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> >> This is no different from working with a bunch of coders and everyone >> agreeing >> on a common code formatting. > > Talk to the maintainer of debhelper ? > dh_make is NOT maintained by Joey Hess, the debhelper maint. In fact he has nothing to do with it.

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Christian Surchi
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:17:36AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > Talk to the maintainer of debhelper ? > > dh_make is NOT maintained by Joey Hess, the debhelper maint. In fact he has > nothing to do with it. Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or file a bug against it. -- Christian Surchi |

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> >> This is no different from working with a bunch of coders and everyone >> agreeing >> on a common code formatting. > > Talk to the maintainer of debhelper ? > dh_make is NOT maintained by Joey Hess, the debhelper maint. In fact he has nothing to do with it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:56:25AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > > > This is what my postinst states: > > > > > > case "$1" in > > configure) > >

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 08:18:20PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 01-Nov-2001 Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > > > This is what my postinst states: > > Lintian is a collection of stupid shell scripts. It tries to catch

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:56:25AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > > > This is what my postinst states: > > > > > > case "$1" in > > configure) > >

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-02 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 08:18:20PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 01-Nov-2001 Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > > > This is what my postinst states: > > Lintian is a collection of stupid shell scripts. It tries to catc

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 01-Nov-2001 Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > Hi, > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > This is what my postinst states: Lintian is a collection of stupid shell scripts. It tries to catch thr common cases and does a pretty good job. My best suggestion is to write your code

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 01-Nov-2001 Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > Hi, > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > This is what my postinst states: Lintian is a collection of stupid shell scripts. It tries to catch thr common cases and does a pretty good job. My best suggestion is to write your cod

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Christian Surchi
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:13:36PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > case "$1" in > > configure) > > ldconfig > > > > W: iiwusynth: postinst-unsafe-ldconfig > > > Sorry, I don't get it ! > > Lintian is cannot parse shell scripts, it checks for some common > variants, and warns if your ver

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Gergely Nagy
> case "$1" in > configure) > ldconfig > W: iiwusynth: postinst-unsafe-ldconfig > Sorry, I don't get it ! Lintian is cannot parse shell scripts, it checks for some common variants, and warns if your version didn't match what it expected. Since you do the right thing, just ignore this

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:18:46PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:13:36PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > > case "$1" in > > > configure) > > > ldconfig > > > > > > > W: iiwusynth: postinst-unsafe-ldconfig > > > > > Sorry, I don't get it ! > > > > Lintian is

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > Hi, > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > This is what my postinst states: > > > case "$1" in > configure) > ldconfig > ;; > > abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) > > ;;

place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
Hi, I'm building my first packages with shared library. This is what my postinst states: case "$1" in configure) ldconfig ;; abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) ;; *) echo "postinst called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2 Still lintian complains ab

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > Hi, > > I'm building my first packages with shared library. > > This is what my postinst states: > > > case "$1" in > configure) > ldconfig > ;; > > abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) > > ;;

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:18:46PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:13:36PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > > case "$1" in > > > configure) > > > ldconfig > > > > > > > W: iiwusynth: postinst-unsafe-ldconfig > > > > > Sorry, I don't get it ! > > > > Lintian i

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Christian Surchi
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:13:36PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > case "$1" in > > configure) > > ldconfig > > > > W: iiwusynth: postinst-unsafe-ldconfig > > > Sorry, I don't get it ! > > Lintian is cannot parse shell scripts, it checks for some common > variants, and warns if your ve

Re: place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Gergely Nagy
> case "$1" in > configure) > ldconfig > W: iiwusynth: postinst-unsafe-ldconfig > Sorry, I don't get it ! Lintian is cannot parse shell scripts, it checks for some common variants, and warns if your version didn't match what it expected. Since you do the right thing, just ignore this

place of ldconfig in postinst

2001-11-01 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
Hi, I'm building my first packages with shared library. This is what my postinst states: case "$1" in configure) ldconfig ;; abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) ;; *) echo "postinst called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2 Still lintian complains a

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-04 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:53:31PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Check the contents of the postinst script in the binary package. The > > #DEBHELPER# line gets repl

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-04 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Drew Parsons wrote: > [...] > > Check the contents of the postinst script in the binary package. The > #DEBHELPER# line gets replaced with debhelper hints based on the various dh_* > commands you've called, and

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-04 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:53:31PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Check the contents of the postinst script in the binary package. The > > #DEBHELPER# line gets rep

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-04 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Drew Parsons wrote: > [...] > > Check the contents of the postinst script in the binary package. The > #DEBHELPER# line gets replaced with debhelper hints based on the various dh_* > commands you've called, an

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Drew Parsons wrote: > W: meschach: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig > (and do I need to put dpkg-shlibdeps in debian/rules somewhere? It seems > fine without it) > My postinst is: > #!/bin/sh > # meschach.postinst, runs ldconfig > set -e > case "$1" in >configu

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Drew Parsons wrote: > W: meschach: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig > (and do I need to put dpkg-shlibdeps in debian/rules somewhere? It seems > fine without it) > My postinst is: > #!/bin/sh > # meschach.postinst, runs ldconfig > set -e > case "$1" in >config

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Drew Parsons
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 02:08:00PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > > But I've noticed just now as I prepare a new upload that lintain complains, > > saying, > > > > W: meschach: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig > > > > anyway there was a bug (#109721) and lintian reported this warnin

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 08:44:40PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > My package meschach has a shared library. Previously, I called ldconfig in > the postinst to get the library registered (it was made mandatory in Policy > 2.4.1.0). > > But I've noticed just now as I prepare a new upload that lintain

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Drew Parsons
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 02:08:00PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > > But I've noticed just now as I prepare a new upload that lintain complains, > > saying, > > > > W: meschach: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig > > > > anyway there was a bug (#109721) and lintian reported this warni

ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Drew Parsons
My package meschach has a shared library. Previously, I called ldconfig in the postinst to get the library registered (it was made mandatory in Policy 2.4.1.0). But I've noticed just now as I prepare a new upload that lintain complains, saying, W: meschach: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig

Re: ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 08:44:40PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > My package meschach has a shared library. Previously, I called ldconfig in > the postinst to get the library registered (it was made mandatory in Policy > 2.4.1.0). > > But I've noticed just now as I prepare a new upload that lintai

ldconfig in postinst

2001-09-03 Thread Drew Parsons
My package meschach has a shared library. Previously, I called ldconfig in the postinst to get the library registered (it was made mandatory in Policy 2.4.1.0). But I've noticed just now as I prepare a new upload that lintain complains, saying, W: meschach: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig