Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 16:49 +, pgbenn...@comcast.net wrote:
> I did test the get-orig-source, in fact I used that to get the source
> that I built with. Perhaps, as you said, you have some default set up
> for wget that I do not have.
>
> Since you have made an update, I need to get
Le Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:39:13PM -0400, Peter Bennett a écrit :
> Kilian
> I will have to use +dfsg1 instead of ~dfsg1, because ~ sorts before the
> base version and now uscan thinks there is a newer version available
> (unless I have failed to understand something here - which is quite likely)
>
6:13 AM
Subject: Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:17 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:16 -0400, Peter Bennett wrote:
> > I have repackaged the source, built, signed, uploaded
> >
> > Version is
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:17 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:16 -0400, Peter Bennett wrote:
> > I have repackaged the source, built, signed, uploaded
> >
> > Version is now 02.01.05+dfsg1-1
> >
> > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> >
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:16 -0400, Peter Bennett wrote:
> I have repackaged the source, built, signed, uploaded
>
> Version is now 02.01.05+dfsg1-1
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jampal
> - dget
> http://mentors
I have repackaged the source, built, signed, uploaded
Version is now 02.01.05+dfsg1-1
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jampal
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jampal/jampal_02.01.05+dfsg1-1.dsc
If all is OK ple
Kilian
I will have to use +dfsg1 instead of ~dfsg1, because ~ sorts before the
base version and now uscan thinks there is a newer version available
(unless I have failed to understand something here - which is quite likely)
jampal: Newer version (02.01.05) available on remote site:
http://qa.deb
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:33:44PM -0400, Peter Bennett wrote:
> Thanks Kilian
>
> I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2,
> with the "looks" directory excluded.
> I will add a get-orig-source target that creates the repackaged source,
> and try to confor
Thanks Kilian
I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2,
with the "looks" directory excluded.
I will add a get-orig-source target that creates the repackaged source,
and try to conform with Debian developers Reference (6.7.8.2 Repackaged
upstream source).
At this time
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am 26.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Peter Bennett:
> > The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are
> > present in the source because I do
> > distribute them with the Windows version of jampal.
> > Jampal r
Hi Peter,
Am 26.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Peter Bennett:
> The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are
> present in the source because I do
> distribute them with the Windows version of jampal.
> Jampal runs fine without them, and some of them are available as
> separate packag
Hi Torsten
The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are
present in the source because I do
distribute them with the Windows version of jampal.
Jampal runs fine without them, and some of them are available as
separate packages in Debian, so the
user can install them if he want
12 matches
Mail list logo
