Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bob> While this is included in policy 3.2.1 (probably earlier - I Bob> can't find it in the changelog), it is not mentioned in Bob> upgrading-checklist.text.gz. This was introduced in version 3.2.0.0. I should have been mentio

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bob> While this is included in policy 3.2.1 (probably earlier - I Bob> can't find it in the changelog), it is not mentioned in Bob> upgrading-checklist.text.gz. This was introduced in version 3.2.0.0. I should have been menti

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-29 Thread Bob Hilliard
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater > > should/ > > > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional > > (though rec

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-29 Thread Bob Hilliard
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater should/ > > > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional > > (though recomme

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-29 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater > should/ > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional > (though recommended) behavior. I hope the Debian policy czars inte

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-29 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater should/ > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional > (though recommended) behavior. I hope the Debian policy czars intend

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 28 January 2001 23:08, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47: > > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater > > should/ > > > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is > > optiona

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Gergely Nagy
Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47: > > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater > should/ > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional > (though recommended) behavior. > Well. In this case: exp

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:14:11PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37: > > Hi, > > > > is there any standard way to create a version of a > > debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use > > the -g compiler switch during compilatio

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 28 January 2001 23:08, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47: > > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater > > should/ > > > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is > > option

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Gergely Nagy
Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47: > > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater should/ > > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional > (though recommended) behavior. > Well. In this case: expor

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:14:11PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37: > > Hi, > > > > is there any standard way to create a version of a > > debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use > > the -g compiler switch during compilati

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Gergely Nagy
Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37: > Hi, > > is there any standard way to create a version of a > debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use > the -g compiler switch during compilation)? you can do a DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug dpkg-buildpcakge, packages should

how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Jochen Voss
Hi, is there any standard way to create a version of a debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use the -g compiler switch during compilation)? My plan is to observe the program with gdb while it is running. And running the program is much easier when it is installed. And installing the p

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Gergely Nagy
Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37: > Hi, > > is there any standard way to create a version of a > debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use > the -g compiler switch during compilation)? you can do a DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug dpkg-buildpcakge, packages shoul

how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Jochen Voss
Hi, is there any standard way to create a version of a debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use the -g compiler switch during compilation)? My plan is to observe the program with gdb while it is running. And running the program is much easier when it is installed. And installing the