Martin Schulze wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > James Troup wrote:
> > > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > > more[3].
> >
> > A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "co
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > James Troup wrote:
> > > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > > more[3].
> >
> > A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "c
Santiago Vila wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
> > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > more[3].
>
> A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "convenience".
File a bug against ftp
Santiago Vila wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
> > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > more[3].
>
> A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "convenience".
File a bug against ft
* Britton
| On 30 Apr 2001, James Troup wrote:
|
| > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
| >
| > I'm sure it could...[0]
|
| Is the procedure for useing anon-rsync documented somewhere else?
rsync keyring.debian.org::keyr
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:37:16PM -0800, Britton wrote:
>
> On 30 Apr 2001, James Troup wrote:
>
> > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
> >
> > I'm sure it could...[0]
It didn't take me too long (just now) to work out tha
On 30 Apr 2001, James Troup wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
>
> I'm sure it could...[0]
Is the procedure for useing anon-rsync documented somewhere else?
> The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] keryi
* Britton
| On 30 Apr 2001, James Troup wrote:
|
| > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
| >
| > I'm sure it could...[0]
|
| Is the procedure for useing anon-rsync documented somewhere else?
rsync keyring.debian.org::key
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:37:16PM -0800, Britton wrote:
>
> On 30 Apr 2001, James Troup wrote:
>
> > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
> >
> > I'm sure it could...[0]
It didn't take me too long (just now) to work out th
On 30 Apr 2001, James Troup wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
>
> I'm sure it could...[0]
Is the procedure for useing anon-rsync documented somewhere else?
> The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kery
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > James Troup wrote:
> > > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > > more[3].
> > A package which
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
> > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > more[3].
>
> A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "convenience".
T
James Troup wrote:
> The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> more[3].
A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "convenience".
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > James Troup wrote:
> > > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > > more[3].
> > A package whic
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
> > The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> > (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> > more[3].
>
> A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "convenience".
James Troup wrote:
> The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
> (via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
> more[3].
A package which is horribly outdated is everything but a "convenience".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:37:52AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
>
> I'm sure it could...[0]
And I would do it if I had the faintest clue what I was talking
about. But as I don't, please could
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:37:52AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
>
> I'm sure it could...[0]
And I would do it if I had the faintest clue what I was talking
about. But as I don't, please coul
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
I'm sure it could...[0]
> (2) I wouldn't have thought of using anonymous rsync either
Err, and? Look, it's very simple:
a) anonymous good, automated access to an allegedly secure account bad.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:34:30AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 0 6 */2 * * cd $HOME/.gnupg; scp -q -C
> > auric.debian.org:/org/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.{gpg,pgp} .
>
> ARGH! FFS, use the anonymous rsync method on keyring.deb
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 0 6 */2 * * cd $HOME/.gnupg; scp -q -C
> auric.debian.org:/org/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.{gpg,pgp} .
ARGH! FFS, use the anonymous rsync method on keyring.debian.org,
that's what it's there for.
--
James
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (1) It could be documented on http://keyring.debian.org/
I'm sure it could...[0]
> (2) I wouldn't have thought of using anonymous rsync either
Err, and? Look, it's very simple:
a) anonymous good, automated access to an allegedly secure account bad
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:34:30AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 0 6 */2 * * cd $HOME/.gnupg; scp -q -C
>auric.debian.org:/org/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.{gpg,pgp} .
>
> ARGH! FFS, use the anonymous rsync method on keyring.debia
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 0 6 */2 * * cd $HOME/.gnupg; scp -q -C
>auric.debian.org:/org/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.{gpg,pgp} .
ARGH! FFS, use the anonymous rsync method on keyring.debian.org,
that's what it's there for.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:47:40PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> You wrote:
>
> > I note that the debian-keyring package is horribly outdated
> > (2000.08.30), how often is it updated? I've reverted to downloading the
> > keyring manually from auric.d.o ...
>
> The sid package should be up to da
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:47:40PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> You wrote:
>
> > I note that the debian-keyring package is horribly outdated
> > (2000.08.30), how often is it updated? I've reverted to downloading the
> > keyring manually from auric.d.o ...
>
> The sid package should be up to d
Hi Timshel!
You wrote:
> I note that the debian-keyring package is horribly outdated
> (2000.08.30), how often is it updated? I've reverted to downloading the
> keyring manually from auric.d.o ...
The sid package should be up to date, I think. Since my system still
runs potato however, I get new
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:18:52AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Install the debian-keyring package (if you haven't already),
I note that the debian-keyring package is horribly outdated
(2000.08.30), how often is it updated? I've reverted to downloading the
keyring manually from auric.d.o ...
Hi Timshel!
You wrote:
> I note that the debian-keyring package is horribly outdated
> (2000.08.30), how often is it updated? I've reverted to downloading the
> keyring manually from auric.d.o ...
The sid package should be up to date, I think. Since my system still
runs potato however, I get ne
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:18:52AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Install the debian-keyring package (if you haven't already),
I note that the debian-keyring package is horribly outdated
(2000.08.30), how often is it updated? I've reverted to downloading the
keyring manually from auric.d.o ...
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:41:37AM +0530, Viral wrote:
> I want to know whether I have to import all the keys in the debian-keyring
> into my public keyring to be able to verify signatures, or is there a
> better way, such as defining other public keyrings/querying a keyserver etc.
Install the de
Hi,
I want to know whether I have to import all the keys in the debian-keyring
into my public keyring to be able to verify signatures, or is there a
better way, such as defining other public keyrings/querying a keyserver etc.
Thanks,
viral
--
And if your head explodes with dark forebodings to
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:41:37AM +0530, Viral wrote:
> I want to know whether I have to import all the keys in the debian-keyring
> into my public keyring to be able to verify signatures, or is there a
> better way, such as defining other public keyrings/querying a keyserver etc.
Install the d
Hi,
I want to know whether I have to import all the keys in the debian-keyring
into my public keyring to be able to verify signatures, or is there a
better way, such as defining other public keyrings/querying a keyserver etc.
Thanks,
viral
--
And if your head explodes with dark forebodings t
34 matches
Mail list logo