Re: glk packages

On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:55:03PM +, David Given wrote: > ...which reminds me; I have a question I've been wanting to ask. Am I > allowed non conffiles in /etc? Yes, but they should still be managed as configuration files (i.e. if the user changes them those changes should be preserved). See

Re: glk packages

On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:55:03PM +, David Given wrote: > ...which reminds me; I have a question I've been wanting to ask. Am I > allowed non conffiles in /etc? Yes, but they should still be managed as configuration files (i.e. if the user changes them those changes should be preserved). See

Re: glk packages

On Friday 09 November 2001 14:42, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > David Given <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd just like to point out that I'm working on packages for a bunch of > > IF interpreters using the glk I/O library; [...] > Are you interested in maintaining the packages for Debian? I could >

glk packages

David Given <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd just like to point out that I'm working on packages for a bunch of > IF interpreters using the glk I/O library; Great! You should register that at http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/apt-sources/> Are you interested in maintaining the package

Re: glk packages

On Friday 09 November 2001 14:42, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > David Given <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd just like to point out that I'm working on packages for a bunch of > > IF interpreters using the glk I/O library; [...] > Are you interested in maintaining the packages for Debian? I could >

glk packages

David Given <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd just like to point out that I'm working on packages for a bunch of > IF interpreters using the glk I/O library; Great! You should register that at http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/apt-sources/> Are you interested in maintaining the packag