I have just submitted the issue as bug# 314771.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Guido van Steen
wrote:
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> } this is not what I mean: I don't like the "comments" feature of debexpo,
> } my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent
> } to the corresponding
Hi Thibaut,
} this is not what I mean: I don't like the "comments" feature of debexpo,
} my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent
} to the corresponding RFS bug.
Sorry for my misunderstanding. Yes, comments could indeed be
"referred" to the RFS/ITP bug. Debexpo coul
Le 21/07/2014 10:37, Guido van Steen a écrit :
> } IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP
> } bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug.
>
> AFAIAA there is no ITP or RFS for the package debexpo (the software at
> issue, which is running at mentors.debian.
} IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP
} bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug.
AFAIAA there is no ITP or RFS for the package debexpo (the software at
issue, which is running at mentors.debian.net).
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentor
Le 19/07/2014 17:00, Guido van Steen a écrit :
> I agree with Joris.
>
> Users are not properly informed that discussions on mentors.debian.net
> may be automatically lost after a package is removed from
> mentors.debian.net. This should be changed. I would rather see the
> information backed-up i
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joris van Rantwijk wrote:
> I actually found two Debian developers who have been very helpful and
> were willing to sponsor the package. Unfortunately we then discovered
> a copyright issue which makes it impossible to distribute GHDL in the
> Debian archive. I'm s
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Guido van Steen wrote:
> Does this require a bug report again debexpo, or is this mailing list
> the place for a discussion?
I think a patch would be more useful, AFAICS no-one has found the time
to work on debexpo since February.
The point of the removal is tha
I agree with Joris.
Users are not properly informed that discussions on mentors.debian.net
may be automatically lost after a package is removed from
mentors.debian.net. This should be changed. I would rather see the
information backed-up in some way before it is deleted.
Does this require a bug r
Joris,
Don't give up. Upload it again and continue trying to find a sponsor. I
used to be a ghdl user in the past, but I'm not good at Ada stuff (afaik
ghdl is written in Ada), so maybe I'm not the best person for this. Try to
approach someone from the Ada team, maybe they can help you.
--
Cheer
Hi Andrew,
On 2014-07-19, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Don't give up. Upload it again and continue trying to find a sponsor.
> I used to be a ghdl user in the past, but I'm not good at Ada stuff
> (afaik ghdl is written in Ada), so maybe I'm not the best person for
> this. Try to approach someone from
On 2014-07-19, mentors.debian.net wrote:
> Your package ghdl all versions has been removed from
> mentors.debian.net for the following reason:
>
> Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks
Ok.
This comes as a bit of a surprise, and it may be unfortunate. My idea
was that, even if no sponsor wou
11 matches
Mail list logo
