Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-10 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 05:40, Jack O'Quin wrote: > Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I thought jackstart was essentially equivalent to a generic wrapper > > - both require RTcap-patched kernel. Which would mean the only > > difference between 2 and 3 here is the use of jackstart vs. ge

Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-10 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 05:40, Jack O'Quin wrote: > Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I thought jackstart was essentially equivalent to a generic wrapper > > - both require RTcap-patched kernel. Which would mean the only > > difference between 2 and 3 here is the use of jackstart vs. ge

Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-07 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Jack O'Quin wrote: > So far, no one is sure why CAP_SYS_RESOURCE is needed, but we find > that mlockall() fails without it. For good reason. The resource in question is physical memory. You could lock all the free memory with this program (thereby condemning it to swap death) if you're not VE

Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-07 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Jack O'Quin wrote: > So far, no one is sure why CAP_SYS_RESOURCE is needed, but we find > that mlockall() fails without it. For good reason. The resource in question is physical memory. You could lock all the free memory with this program (thereby condemning it to swap death) if you're not VE

Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-01 Thread Jack O'Quin
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (Thread was on debian-mentors, now being moved to debian-multimedia for > those interested...) As a JACK upstream developer and Debian user, I am interested in this discussion. But, I am unclear about the overall context. So, maybe my comments (belo

Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-01 Thread Jack O'Quin
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (Thread was on debian-mentors, now being moved to debian-multimedia for > those interested...) As a JACK upstream developer and Debian user, I am interested in this discussion. But, I am unclear about the overall context. So, maybe my comments (belo

fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
(Thread was on debian-mentors, now being moved to debian-multimedia for those interested...) -Forwarded Message- > From: Robert Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > That's it for now. Do you guys think a small policy/ recommendation > > doclet wou

fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

2003-11-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
(Thread was on debian-mentors, now being moved to debian-multimedia for those interested...) -Forwarded Message- > From: Robert Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > That's it for now. Do you guys think a small policy/ recommendation > > doclet wou