RE: font policy changes

2008-07-17 Thread unifoundry
> Original Message > Subject: Re: font policy changes > From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, July 17, 2008 1:38 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 00

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 00:19:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What I meant by "don't work" is that, as you mention, these two options > are no-ops. > > According to the update-fonts-dir(1) man page, these options should not > be no-ops: > === > update-fonts-dir creates a fonts.di

RE: font policy changes

2008-07-17 Thread unifoundry
> Original Message > Subject: Re: font policy changes > From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, July 16, 2008 8:47 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:37:12 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thank you. I can write a proposed addition to the Policy Manual for > TrueType fonts after I'm done with the current package unless someone > else wants to do it. The "update-fonts-dir" utility currently only > handles fonts in t

RE: font policy changes

2008-07-16 Thread unifoundry
> Original Message > Subject: Re: font policy changes > From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, July 16, 2008 4:20 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > > The font caches should be au

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 13 juillet 2008 à 21:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > 4) What are the preferred steps for registering a TrueType font in > Debian? It is outside the X11 directory structure, and depends on the > TrueType font server. GNOME recognizes a newly installed TrueType font > but is the

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe HOME was still set to the user's home dir? If XAUTHORITY isn't > set Xlib looks in $HOME/.Xauthority, so that may work depending how you > get root. Ah, XAUTHORITY was set. Thank you. I didn't know about that. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECT

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 08:50:57 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It will always fail, because the user running the script (root) won't > > normally have access to the X server. > > See, I thought that too, and then I tried it and it seemed to work fine.

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-14 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 14 juillet 2008, vers 17:50, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : >> It will always fail, because the user running the script (root) won't >> normally have access to the X server. > See, I thought that too, and then I tried it and it seemed to work

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 22:13:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> 3) Even if "mkfontdir" were invoked directly or if it's okay to give >>> "update-fonts-dir" an absolute path (in which case its man page needs to >>> be updated

RE: font policy changes

2008-07-14 Thread unifoundry
> Original Message > Subject: Re: font policy changes > From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, July 14, 2008 2:26 am > To: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian-mentors@lists.

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 22:13:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > 3) Even if "mkfontdir" were invoked directly or if it's okay to give > > "update-fonts-dir" an absolute path (in which case its man page needs to > > be updated and the warning removed), isn't it also ad

RE: font policy changes

2008-07-13 Thread unifoundry
> Original Message > Subject: Re: font policy changes > From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, July 13, 2008 10:13 pm > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, > "Anthony Fok" <[EMAIL

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-13 Thread Russ Allbery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 3) Even if "mkfontdir" were invoked directly or if it's okay to give > "update-fonts-dir" an absolute path (in which case its man page needs to > be updated and the warning removed), isn't it also advisable to run > "xset fp rehash" in postinst and postrm scripts? That

font policy changes

2008-07-13 Thread unifoundry
I am wrapping up the Debian packages (font + sources + binary utilities package) for the GNU Unifont. I believe that some things in the Debian Policy Manual version 3.8.0.1, 2008-06-05, concerning fonts are outdated. Comments and suggestions are welcome. I'm running the stable Etch 4.0r3 release