On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sure when it is about debs. But could someone with evil intentions
> upload a 100 megs file, for instance?
Yes. DoS'ing the incoming ftp queue is possible.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that some anonymous people are allowed to feed our
> > upload queues with some undesirable trash?
>
> Yes, but I guess nothing is processed without checking the signature.
Sure when it is about debs. But could someone with evil intentions
upload
Hi Jérôme!
You wrote:
> > [Orthogonally, ] Consider using anonymous ftp instead; both ftp-master
> > and non-US have anonymous-ftp upload queues.
>
> Does this mean that some anonymous people are allowed to feed our
> upload queues with some undesirable trash?
Yes, but I guess nothing is pr
James Troup wrote:
> [Orthogonally, ] Consider using anonymous ftp instead; both ftp-master
> and non-US have anonymous-ftp upload queues.
Does this mean that some anonymous people are allowed to feed our
upload queues with some undesirable trash?
--
Jérôme Marant
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sure when it is about debs. But could someone with evil intentions
> upload a 100 megs file, for instance?
Yes. DoS'ing the incoming ftp queue is possible.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that some anonymous people are allowed to feed our
> > upload queues with some undesirable trash?
>
> Yes, but I guess nothing is processed without checking the signature.
Sure when it is about debs. But could someone with evil intentions
upload
Hi Jérôme!
You wrote:
> > [Orthogonally, ] Consider using anonymous ftp instead; both ftp-master
> > and non-US have anonymous-ftp upload queues.
>
> Does this mean that some anonymous people are allowed to feed our
> upload queues with some undesirable trash?
Yes, but I guess nothing is p
James Troup wrote:
> [Orthogonally, ] Consider using anonymous ftp instead; both ftp-master
> and non-US have anonymous-ftp upload queues.
Does this mean that some anonymous people are allowed to feed our
upload queues with some undesirable trash?
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way to make dupload pass the -1 option to scp? I
> have to enter my password for each file that is uploaded, which is
> undesirable.
[Orthogonally, ] Consider using anonymous ftp instead; both ftp-master
and non-US have anonymous-ftp u
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 05:48:17PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Is there any way to make dupload pass the -1 option to scp? I
> have to enter my password for each file that is uploaded, which is
> undesirable.
You could generate a new ssh key for version 2...
Try editing your ~/.ssh/config
Is there any way to make dupload pass the -1 option to scp? I
have to enter my password for each file that is uploaded, which is
undesirable.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way to make dupload pass the -1 option to scp? I
> have to enter my password for each file that is uploaded, which is
> undesirable.
[Orthogonally, ] Consider using anonymous ftp instead; both ftp-master
and non-US have anonymous-ftp
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 05:48:17PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Is there any way to make dupload pass the -1 option to scp? I
> have to enter my password for each file that is uploaded, which is
> undesirable.
You could generate a new ssh key for version 2...
Try editing your ~/.ssh/config
Is there any way to make dupload pass the -1 option to scp? I
have to enter my password for each file that is uploaded, which is
undesirable.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
14 matches
Mail list logo
