On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:41:37AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> > Since this is a new revision, if I dupload dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes it
> > won't upload the original tarball which is fine, except that somehow, the
> > first
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:41:37AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> > Since this is a new revision, if I dupload dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes it
> > won't upload the original tarball which is fine, except that somehow, the
> > firs
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> I'm struggling to upload a new revision of a package.
>
> Since this is a new revision, if I dupload dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes it
> won't upload the original tarball which is fine, except that somehow, the
> first revision in p
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> I'm struggling to upload a new revision of a package.
>
> Since this is a new revision, if I dupload dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes it
> won't upload the original tarball which is fine, except that somehow, the
> first revision in
Hi!
I'm struggling to upload a new revision of a package.
Basically I have:
dietlibc_0.11-2.diff.gz
dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes
dietlibc-dev_0.11-2_i386.deb
dietlibc_0.11-2.dsc
dietlibc_0.11.orig.tar.gz
Since this is a new revision, if I dupload dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes it
w
Hi!
I'm struggling to upload a new revision of a package.
Basically I have:
dietlibc_0.11-2.diff.gz
dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes
dietlibc-dev_0.11-2_i386.deb
dietlibc_0.11-2.dsc
dietlibc_0.11.orig.tar.gz
Since this is a new revision, if I dupload dietlibc_0.11-2_i386.changes it
6 matches
Mail list logo