On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Change it to "rm -f ...". That way, you wont get an error. You should do
> > it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
> > removes the file before removin
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Change it to "rm -f ...". That way, you wont get an error. You should do
> > it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
> > removes the file before removi
* Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010521 20:38]:
> hear, hear ... the law ... what's the fine for not useing -f? :)
dpkg errors (and thus RC bugs ;)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Change it to "rm -f ...". That way, you wont get an error. You should do
> > it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
> > removes the file before removing the package.
> It's not only a good id
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Change it to "rm -f ...". That way, you wont get an error. You should do
> it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
> removes the file before removing the package.
It's not only a good idea. It's the law (policy 6.2.).
--
* Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010521 20:38]:
> hear, hear ... the law ... what's the fine for not useing -f? :)
dpkg errors (and thus RC bugs ;)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Change it to "rm -f ...". That way, you wont get an error. You should do
> > it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
> > removes the file before removing the package.
> It's not only a good i
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Change it to "rm -f ...". That way, you wont get an error. You should do
> it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
> removes the file before removing the package.
It's not only a good idea. It's the law (policy 6.2.).
--
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:46:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
> a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
> hand in the postinst:
> # purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
> i
hi,
i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
hand in the postinst:
# purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
if [ "$1" = purge ] ; then
rm /etc/modlogan/modlogan.conf
fi
ok, i've
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:46:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
> a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
> hand in the postinst:
> # purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
>
hi,
i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
hand in the postinst:
# purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
if [ "$1" = purge ] ; then
rm /etc/modlogan/modlogan.conf
fi
ok, i've
12 matches
Mail list logo