Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (but don't crash if it doesn't exist - hence the "-" before "rm".
So THAT'S what the '-' is for!! Weee... :)
> > Of course, this is going to be an icky solution either way, because
> > it means your package can't autobuild.
>
> Eh - why not.
Because
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 12:31:54PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 01:59:25PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > > > Anything I can do to override this? It's on purpose, so that I don't
> > > > h
Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 01:59:25PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > > Anything I can do to override this? It's on purpose, so that I don't
> > > have to include the whole pike/0.6 tree (the 'pike_0.6.110.orig.tar.gz'
> > >
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 01:59:25PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > Anything I can do to override this? It's on purpose, so that I don't
> > have to include the whole pike/0.6 tree (the 'pike_0.6.110.orig.tar.gz'
> > tarball)...
>
> -rm pike/0
ding roxen using existing roxen_1.2.46.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: building roxen in roxen_1.2.46-3.diff.gz
> dpkg-source: cannot represent change to pike/0.6:
> dpkg-source: new version is symlink
> dpkg-source: old version is nonexistent
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of fi
.diff.gz
dpkg-source: cannot represent change to pike/0.6:
dpkg-source: new version is symlink
dpkg-source: old version is nonexistent
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file extern/stamp-h.in
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file server/base_server/TAGS
dpkg-source: building roxen i
6 matches
Mail list logo
