* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:08:52 +0100]:
> With respect to speed,
(Er, sorry; this paragraph refers to dpatch, which isn't immediately
clear.)
> it must be that most people use it in small
> trees,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
* Kevin B. McCarty [Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:39:17 -0500]:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > There are also other alternatives to dpatch; one is Debian-specific and
> > i keep forgetting its name, and there's quilt. The main advantage of
> > quilt IMHO is that it doesn't duplicate the whole tree when editing
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 11:39:17AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Frank K?ster wrote:
>
> > There are also other alternatives to dpatch; one is Debian-specific and
> > i keep forgetting its name,
Are you thinking of dbs?
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Frank Küster wrote:
> There are also other alternatives to dpatch; one is Debian-specific and
> i keep forgetting its name, and there's quilt. The main advantage of
> quilt IMHO is that it doesn't duplicate the whole tree when editing and
> updating the patch, which can be time- and disk-consumin
4 matches
Mail list logo
