Patrick Schleizer:
> I am maintaining two Debian derivatives distributions, Whonix and
> Kicksecure. (Open Source) I hope you don't mind my question.
>
> I am trying to build a custom meta package with 'Architecture: all' that
> has an architecture specific dependency:
> hardened-malloc [amd64]
A
Dependencies for hardened systems CLI
A metapackage, which installs command line interface (CLI) packages
which should be installed on hardened systems.
debhelper fails with the following error message
>dh_gencontrol
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: the Depends field contains an arch-specifi
Dependencies for hardened systems CLI
A metapackage, which installs command line interface (CLI) packages
which should be installed on hardened systems.
debhelper fails with the following error message
>dh_gencontrol
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: the Depends field contains an arch-specifi
Thanks a lot Russ.
I found my problem happens to be more than that, I.e., I should deal with
"empty-binary-package" first. Once I got it properly build I see perl
shows up on the Depends line.
Depends: perl, dnsmasq, curl
Sorry about the noise.
Thanks again.
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 18:29:52
T o n g writes:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:26:10 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>> If you think ${perl:Depends} should have a value then there may be
>> something else going on; what does dbab end up depending on once it's
>> built? (dpkg-deb -I dbab*deb will tell you.)
>>
>> (Note that IO::Socket::I
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:26:10 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>> My packages gives this warning:
>>
>> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package dbab: unknown
>> substitution variable ${perl:Depends}
>>
>> I am packaging Perl stuff, and I do use IO
Hi,
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:24:59 + (UTC), T o n g
wrote:
> My packages gives this warning:
>
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package dbab: unknown
> substitution variable ${perl:Depends}
>
> I am packaging Perl stuff, and I do use IO::Socket::INET in m
Hi,
My packages gives this warning:
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package dbab: unknown
substitution variable ${perl:Depends}
I am packaging Perl stuff, and I do use IO::Socket::INET in my code:
https://github.com/suntong001/dbab/blob/master/src/bin/dbab-svr
In https
* Steve Langasek [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:29:16 -0700]:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month.
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg00133.html
> > > A package depends on "apache | apache
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]:
> > Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking
> > about something like this:
> > Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] |
>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch
> which (maybe) fix the bug without any answer from the maintainers.
If you are interested in seeing this (minor) bug fixed, helpful actions
include:
- Applying the
* Steve Langasek [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:29:16 -0700]:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month.
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg00133.html
> > > A package depends on "apache | apache
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]:
> > Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking
> > about something like this:
> > Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] |
>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch
> which (maybe) fix the bug without any answer from the maintainers.
If you are interested in seeing this (minor) bug fixed, helpful actions
include:
- Applying the
* Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]:
> Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking
> about something like this:
> Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] |
there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month.
[1] h
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 20:03, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto:
> But if I change the order of the packages apt doesn't try to install
> apache (and this is right, of course) but try to install apache-common
> and apache-utils... !!!
>
> # apt-get install apache2 gallery
> [ .. snip .. ]
> The follo
You have replied in private, I hope you won't mind if I answer on the
list...
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 19:36, Nick Lewycky ha scritto:
> Is this any different from bug 122304?
> Nick
Yep, you are right, I think the bug is the same...
But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch
wh
On 2004-07-24 Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think
> apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field.
> Here there is an example, gallery depends on:
> >> Depends: apache |
Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think
apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field.
Here there is an example, gallery depends on:
>> Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ...
On my machine I haven't installed any of them, so if
* Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]:
> Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking
> about something like this:
> Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] |
there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month.
[1] h
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 20:03, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto:
> But if I change the order of the packages apt doesn't try to install
> apache (and this is right, of course) but try to install apache-common
> and apache-utils... !!!
>
> # apt-get install apache2 gallery
> [ .. snip .. ]
> The follo
You have replied in private, I hope you won't mind if I answer on the
list...
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 19:36, Nick Lewycky ha scritto:
> Is this any different from bug 122304?
> Nick
Yep, you are right, I think the bug is the same...
But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch
wh
On 2004-07-24 Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think
> apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field.
> Here there is an example, gallery depends on:
> >> Depends: apache |
Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think
apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field.
Here there is an example, gallery depends on:
>> Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ...
On my machine I haven't installed any of them, so if
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:32:16AM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> > > I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
> > > Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depends
> > > field for my binary?
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:32:16AM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> > > I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
> > > Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depends
> > > field for my binary?
> >
> >
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:43:37PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:08:19AM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> > I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
> > Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depends
&
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:43:37PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:08:19AM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> > I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
> > Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depend
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:08:19AM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
> Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depends
> field for my binary?
What?
> For now I get number of messages
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:08:19AM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
> Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depends
> field for my binary?
What?
> For now I get number of messages
Hello.
I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depends
field for my binary?
For now I get number of messages like
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find any packages for (libfoo-1.0.0.so.0)
dpkg
Hello.
I have a source from that I build some library packages and binary one.
Binary depends on all the libs I build. What should I put in Depends
field for my binary?
For now I get number of messages like
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find any packages for (libfoo-1.0.0.so.0)
dpkg
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> On 4 Mar 1999, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>> Depends: roxen-pike (>= 1.2.46) | (pike (>= 0.6), pike-image
>> (>= 0.6)), ${shlibs:Depends}
Jules> Depends: roxen-pike | pike, roxen-pike | pike-image,
Jules> ${shlibs:De
On 4 Mar 1999, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Depends: roxen-pike (>= 1.2.46) | (pike (>= 0.6), pike-image (>= 0.6)),
> ${shlibs:Depends}
>
> How do I write this so it works?
>
> (Ether roxen-pike OR pike. If pike, we need pike-image too...)
Depends: roxen-pike | pike, roxen-pike | pike-image, ${s
Depends: roxen-pike (>= 1.2.46) | (pike (>= 0.6), pike-image (>= 0.6)),
${shlibs:Depends}
How do I write this so it works?
(Ether roxen-pike OR pike. If pike, we need pike-image too...)
--
We are GNU. You will be GPL'ed. Resistance is futile.
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ Turbo Fredriksson <
35 matches
Mail list logo
