___
/ Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hi Arnaud
|
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| > / Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used toda
___
/ Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hi Arnaud
|
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| > / Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used toda
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:20:18PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> > > a package?
> >
> > dh_make.
>
> I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and it
> is way too easy to leave silly buglets in.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:47AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> a package?
dh-make, not that I'm biased or anything
- Craig (dh-make maintainer)
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:20:18PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> > > a package?
> >
> > dh_make.
>
> I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and it
> is way too easy to leave silly buglets in.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:47AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> a package?
dh-make, not that I'm biased or anything
- Craig (dh-make maintainer)
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12
Hi Arnaud
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> / Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
> | > > make a package?
> | > dh_make.
> |
> | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases
Hi Arnaud
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> / Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
> | > > make a package?
> | > dh_make.
> |
> | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:15:57PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> lintian will not catch everything.
In case you want to run lintian *and* linda on debuild, see my patch at
http://bugs.debian.org/178456
There are some things in linda which lintian is not
> | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and
> | it is way too easy to leave silly buglets in.
> |
> | (Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable
> | compromise :)
>
> In every case, I'll have to run lintian (debuild do it automatically,
> isn't it?) t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:15:57PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> lintian will not catch everything.
In case you want to run lintian *and* linda on debuild, see my patch at
http://bugs.debian.org/178456
There are some things in linda which lintian is not
___
/ Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
| > > make a package?
| >
| > dh_make.
|
| I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and
| it is way
___
/ Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:47AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
| > make a package?
|
| dh_make.
Thank you for your (quick)
> > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> > a package?
>
> dh_make.
I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and it
is way too easy to leave silly buglets in.
(Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable
compromise :)
pgp
Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> | > As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I
> | > propose the creation of a document to be available at
> | > http://www.debian.org/devel explaining about this two scripts.
> | >
>
> | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and
> | it is way too easy to leave silly buglets in.
> |
> | (Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable
> | compromise :)
>
> In every case, I'll have to run lintian (debuild do it automatically,
> isn't it?) t
Hi all,
I'm new to the list and I'd like to make Debian packages. I read this
mail and the question follows...
___
/ Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Daniel Ruoso wrote:
| > As debmake and dh-make are the two
___
/ Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
| > > make a package?
| >
| > dh_make.
|
| I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and
| it is way
___
/ Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:47AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
| > make a package?
|
| dh_make.
Thank you for your (quick)
> > If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> > a package?
>
> dh_make.
I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and it
is way too easy to leave silly buglets in.
(Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable
compromise :)
ms
Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> | > As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I
> | > propose the creation of a document to be available at
> | > http://www.debian.org/devel explaining about this two scripts.
> | >
>
Hi all,
I'm new to the list and I'd like to make Debian packages. I read this
mail and the question follows...
___
/ Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Daniel Ruoso wrote:
| > As debmake and dh-make are the two
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> as I can see, this is a recurrent question (I've made the same question
> a year ago). I have a proposal:
>
> As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I propose
> the creation of a document to be available at
> http://www.debi
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> as I can see, this is a recurrent question (I've made the same question
> a year ago). I have a proposal:
>
> As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I propose
> the creation of a document to be available at
> http://www.debi
Hi,
as I can see, this is a recurrent question (I've made the same question
a year ago). I have a proposal:
As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I propose
the creation of a document to be available at
http://www.debian.org/devel explaining about this two scripts
Hi,
as I can see, this is a recurrent question (I've made the same question
a year ago). I have a proposal:
As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts, I propose
the creation of a document to be available at
http://www.debian.org/devel explaining about this two scripts
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
> was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
> both?
debmake was definitely first, then came dh-make. dh-make was created
because maintain
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
> was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
> both?
debmake was definitely first, then came dh-make. dh-make was created
because maintain
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages?
It is really more debmake and debhelper than debmake and dh-make.
[ dh-make is just a tool to ease the creation of debhelper-based
debian/* files, but you can also use debhelper without dh-make ].
> Which one was
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
> was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
> both?
different things? :)
debmake is a (old?) tool to make debian packages, alternative to
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages?
It is really more debmake and debhelper than debmake and dh-make.
[ dh-make is just a tool to ease the creation of debhelper-based
debian/* files, but you can also use debhelper without dh-make ].
> Which one was
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
> was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
> both?
different things? :)
debmake is a (old?) tool to make debian packages, alternative to
Hi, I am not sure this is appropriate for -mentors, but I couldn't
find a -history list :)
What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
both?
Just curious,
--
Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.S.A.
Hi, I am not sure this is appropriate for -mentors, but I couldn't
find a -history list :)
What is the story behind these 2 packages? Which one was first, what
was the rationale for creating the other, and why do we still have
both?
Just curious,
--
Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.S.A.
34 matches
Mail list logo
