Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Richard Braakman
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 05:28:52PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: > On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:56:46PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > In short, it's up to you. > > I was told that "Closes: #12345"-like entries in the changelog > only close bugs which are mentioned in the most recent release. > You mus

Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Jochen Voss
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:56:46PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > In short, it's up to you. I was told that "Closes: #12345"-like entries in the changelog only close bugs which are mentioned in the most recent release. You must close bugs in older (but not uploaded) releases manually. So it may be

Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Richard Braakman
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 05:28:52PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: > On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:56:46PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > In short, it's up to you. > > I was told that "Closes: #12345"-like entries in the changelog > only close bugs which are mentioned in the most recent release. > You mu

Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Jochen Voss
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:56:46PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > In short, it's up to you. I was told that "Closes: #12345"-like entries in the changelog only close bugs which are mentioned in the most recent release. You must close bugs in older (but not uploaded) releases manually. So it may b

Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Jochen Voss wrote: > last week I prepared a new package for the gnome-utils package > and asked for a sponsor. As nobody volunteered this one was > not uploaded to the server. > > Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and > want to prepare a new package. Shou

Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Jochen Voss wrote: > last week I prepared a new package for the gnome-utils package > and asked for a sponsor. As nobody volunteered this one was > not uploaded to the server. > > Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and > want to prepare a new package. Sho

RE: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-23 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and > want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the > Debian revision number for this (to avoid possible confusion) > or should I just replace my files with new version (to keep > the revision numbers of official versions contiguous

debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-23 Thread Jochen Voss
Hi, last week I prepared a new package for the gnome-utils package and asked for a sponsor. As nobody volunteered this one was not uploaded to the server. Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the Debian revision number for th

RE: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-23 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and > want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the > Debian revision number for this (to avoid possible confusion) > or should I just replace my files with new version (to keep > the revision numbers of official versions contiguou

debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-23 Thread Jochen Voss
Hi, last week I prepared a new package for the gnome-utils package and asked for a sponsor. As nobody volunteered this one was not uploaded to the server. Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the Debian revision number for t