On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:55:55PM +0100, GCS wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> > upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
> Ofcours
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:55:55PM +0100, GCS wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> > upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
> Ofcourse y
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
Ofcourse you mean tar+gzip that, as orig is always tar.gz; alhough I
th
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Now I'm strongly considering making the switch to Debian and am
> evaluating moving my whole installation system over to dpkg. dpkg
> seems superior to rpm in almost all respects (richer dependencies,
> better documentation, more r
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
Ofcourse you mean tar+gzip that, as orig is always tar.gz; alhough I
thi
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Now I'm strongly considering making the switch to Debian and am
> evaluating moving my whole installation system over to dpkg. dpkg
> seems superior to rpm in almost all respects (richer dependencies,
> better documentation, more r
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
It's right, a Debian source package is usually distributed as a single
source and a single diff (sometimes there
Hi.
I suppose you have already found the most generic pointers like new
maintainer guide ans such.
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
> Coming from an rpm perspective,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
It's right, a Debian source package is usually distributed as a single
source and a single diff (sometimes there
Although philosophically more aligned with Debian, I had been a RedHat
user for almost 8 years largely pragmatic reasons that aren't
relevant. As such, I have developed a large rpm-based infrastructure
for releasing my company's own software to our production facilities
and have become quite fami
Hi.
I suppose you have already found the most generic pointers like new
maintainer guide ans such.
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
> Coming from an rpm perspective,
Although philosophically more aligned with Debian, I had been a RedHat
user for almost 8 years largely pragmatic reasons that aren't
relevant. As such, I have developed a large rpm-based infrastructure
for releasing my company's own software to our production facilities
and have become quite fami
12 matches
Mail list logo
