Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am working on packages from cvs upstream sources. How should I name
> their debian version ? I give a few examples below.
>
> Is there a spec for this somewhere ?
In the policy?
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.txt.gz
3.2.1. Version numbers base
Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am working on packages from cvs upstream sources. How should I name
> their debian version ? I give a few examples below.
>
> Is there a spec for this somewhere ?
In the policy?
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.txt.gz
3.2.1. Version numbers base
Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am working on packages from cvs upstream sources. How should I name
> their debian version ? I give a few examples below.
>
> Namely, for the package hello i get 2 different tarballs :
> hello-2003-12-13-cvs.tar.gz (future 4.1.0 release)
>
Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am working on packages from cvs upstream sources. How should I name
> their debian version ? I give a few examples below.
>
> Namely, for the package hello i get 2 different tarballs :
> hello-2003-12-13-cvs.tar.gz (future 4.1.0 release)
>
Hi all.
I am working on packages from cvs upstream sources. How should I name
their debian version ? I give a few examples below.
Is there a spec for this somewhere ?
Thanx,
piem
Namely, for the package hello i get 2 different tarballs :
hello-2003-12-13-cvs.tar.gz (future 4.1.0 release)
hel
Hi all.
I am working on packages from cvs upstream sources. How should I name
their debian version ? I give a few examples below.
Is there a spec for this somewhere ?
Thanx,
piem
Namely, for the package hello i get 2 different tarballs :
hello-2003-12-13-cvs.tar.gz (future 4.1.0 release)
hel
6 matches
Mail list logo