Alexandre wrote:
[...]
Let package A depend on package B and C.
Let package B depend on package C.
I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
OK -- or better -- to let it depend only on B?
[...]
So I'm pretty certa
Alexandre wrote:
[...]
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better -- to let it depend only on B?
[...]
> So I'm p
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better -
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better -
On Mon, 02 Sep 2002, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better -- to let it depend o
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better -
Hello,
Let package A depend on package B and C.
Let package B depend on package C.
I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
OK -- or better -- to let it depend only on B?
In the case at hand:
A = python2.1-xml
B =
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better
On Mon, 02 Sep 2002, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better -- to let it depend
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let package A depend on package B and C.
> Let package B depend on package C.
> I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
>
> Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
> OK -- or better
Hello,
Let package A depend on package B and C.
Let package B depend on package C.
I maintain A, someone else maintains B and C.
Should I explicitely let A depend on B and C in debian/control, or is it
OK -- or better -- to let it depend only on B?
In the case at hand:
A = python2.1-xml
B =
12 matches
Mail list logo