On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:00:15PM +0100, Adeodato wrote:
> * Peter Pentchev [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:09:07 +0200]:
>
> > > If the different implementations conflict among them, I don't think you
> > > can build all three SL{1,2,3} binary packages from the same source
> > > package.
>
> > Well, actua
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 18:09:07 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:30:25PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > * Thorsten Alteholz [Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:06:09 +0200]:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I need some advice on building packages with different libs.
> > > Assuming tha
* Peter Pentchev [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:09:07 +0200]:
> > If the different implementations conflict among them, I don't think you
> > can build all three SL{1,2,3} binary packages from the same source
> > package.
> Well, actually, you can - just look at the various apache2 packages.
> However, the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:30:25PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Thorsten Alteholz [Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:06:09 +0200]:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
> > I need some advice on building packages with different libs.
> > Assuming that I have software S which needs to be linked against library L.
> > For
* Thorsten Alteholz [Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:06:09 +0200]:
> Hi,
Hello,
> I need some advice on building packages with different libs.
> Assuming that I have software S which needs to be linked against library L.
> For whatever reason there are several implementations (L1, L2, L3) of
> this library
Hi,
I need some advice on building packages with different libs.
Assuming that I have software S which needs to be linked against library L.
For whatever reason there are several implementations (L1, L2, L3) of this
library available. Each of them has its advantages and it would be fine
to buil
6 matches
Mail list logo
