Hello,
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
> have other things to do with my computers :) so I'd rather not have
> testing or unstable accidentally run roughshod over my
> filesystem--what's "the" (or "a") preferred way of setting up a test
> environment? New partition? UML? chroot with de
In 2/17/06, Jonathan Niehof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Since updated packages go into unstable, presumably they should be
> tested in an unstable environment. But they also want to percolate
> into testing, so they shouldn't break or be broken by testing. So I
> presume it's best to have an un
I'd like to get going on some bug-squashing, but have three
semi-related questions:
1) Since updated packages go into unstable, presumably they should be
tested in an unstable environment. But they also want to percolate
into testing, so they shouldn't break or be broken by testing. So I
presume i
Jamie Jones wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:29 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
No problems. Built the new package on amd64. Still some warnings in
avinfo.c about "cast from pointer to integer of different size"
Thanks! That was my stupidity: an unchanged line remained in the code.
Corrected.
--
Jamie Jones wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:29 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
No problems. Built the new package on amd64. Still some warnings in
avinfo.c about "cast from pointer to integer of different size"
Thanks! That was my stupidity: an unchanged line remained in the code.
Corrected.
--
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:29 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
No problems. Built the new package on amd64. Still some warnings in
avinfo.c about "cast from pointer to integer of different size"
Jamie
--
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x42E2C1E5
Fin
Jamie Jones wrote:
Builds on amd64.
Oops. Forgot to attach the build log earlier.
Thanks to Jamie and Geert, your build reports helped me to hunt couple
of bugs in the upsream's source and also in ./debian/rules!
The package is updated:
http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/
Still seeking for a sponso
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:23 +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:54 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
> > will help me a lot! If somebody decides to sponsor it that will
> > be even better ;-)
> >
> Builds on amd64.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:54:34PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> >Post in a follow-up message where to find the "AVInfo" work you did.
> >And see if you get any feedback like
> >
> > It compiles fine on $ARCH
>
> The package is on http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:54 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
> will help me a lot! If somebody decides to sponsor it that will
> be even better ;-)
>
Builds on amd64.
--
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attac
Geert Stappers wrote:
Post in a follow-up message where to find the "AVInfo" work you did.
And see if you get any feedback like
It compiles fine on $ARCH
The package is on http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/
lintian-clean, builds in pbuilder w/o problems.
have been also checked by several people in
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:36:48AM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seem that nobody has got interested in sponsoring AVInfo yet. Perhaps,
> my advertising was too pushing ;) Anyway, I have got a question I would
> like to ask. Is there any kind of testing buid system (maybe unoff
Hello,
It seem that nobody has got interested in sponsoring AVInfo yet. Perhaps,
my advertising was too pushing ;) Anyway, I have got a question I would
like to ask. Is there any kind of testing buid system (maybe unofficial one),
I mean something where I can upload my package to and try to compil
13 matches
Mail list logo
