Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:25:34 -0400
with message-id <87y4n1as9t@setec.io>
and subject line Appears to be completed
has caused the Debian Bug report #778638,
regarding Debian Bug Tracking System
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib"
Package name: owslib
Version : 0.8.13-1~exp
Upstream Author : Tom Kralidis
URL : http://geopython.git
/
* Package name: flyspray
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Tony Collins
* URL : http://flyspray.rocks.cc/
* License : GPL
Description : a light Bug Tracking System (BTS) in php
Description: a light Bug Tracking System (BTS) in php
Flyspray is an
/
* Package name: flyspray
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Tony Collins
* URL : http://flyspray.rocks.cc/
* License : GPL
Description : a light Bug Tracking System (BTS) in php
Description: a light Bug Tracking System (BTS) in php
Flyspray is an
"Martin Bialasinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changing the title of the bug would be better. The subject of the
> simgle mails added to the report is not that visible along the other
> headers.
Doh yes. Don't read what I write but what I mean!
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to
>> "Peter" == Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter> It would be nice if every user of debian solved as many bugs as
Peter> they could. Probally adding "[FIX]" to the subject would
Peter> increase the chance that somebody takes care of the patches if
Peter> the maintainer doesn't.
Chang
do
> these things.
[IMHO:]
Everybody can and should hunt every bug down and report patches via the
Bug Tracking System. It's just a part of the social contract.
Gaining maintainerhood doesn't get you smart. Work does.
It would be nice if every user of debian solved as many bugs as they
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:36:30AM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, David Coe wrote:
>
> > Under "Adopting a Package" the debian developers' reference manual
> ^^^
> No offence, but why is it that non-developers
Le Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:36:30AM +1200, Michael Beattie écrivait:
> > I'd like to do that, but am not yet a sanctioned developer;
> > do you think I should send that email, or do I really have
> > to wait? Thanks.
I think you should wait. What I would suggest is that you find someone
who wou
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, David Coe wrote:
> Under "Adopting a Package" the debian developers' reference manual
^^^
> says (among other things):
>
>If you take over an old package, you probably want to be
>listed as the package
Under "Adopting a Package" the debian developers' reference manual
says (among other things):
If you take over an old package, you probably want to be
listed as the package's official maintainer in the bug
system. This will happen automatically once you upload a
new version with an
> Please note
>
> a) The master database for the Bugtracking system is on master
>
> b) The master web pages for the bts are created out of them
>
> c) The are mirrored to www.debian.org and some other mirrors
> several times a day.
>
> d) Regular mirror might mirror it from www.
>
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 08:11:55PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about the bug tracking system, for instance after trying
> to close a bug, I got:
>
> Bug#14159: xinetd: Startup script uses rpc.portmap instead of portmap
> Bug is already closed, cannot re-cl
I'm a bit confused about the bug tracking system, for instance after trying
to close a bug, I got:
Bug#14159: xinetd: Startup script uses rpc.portmap instead of portmap
Bug is already closed, cannot re-close.
On the web page, it doesnt say anything that bug beeing closed, infact using
the
14 matches
Mail list logo
