Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
> > people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
> > this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
>
> So why not "N"? That may leave the package, at wors
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
> > people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
> > this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
>
> So why not "N"? That may leave the package, at wors
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote:
> As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
> people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
> this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not "N"? That may leave the package, at worst, in a "I
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote:
> As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
> people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
> this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not "N"? That may leave the package, at worst, in a "I
Eric Winger wrote:
> Can't I even "Depend" on a package and then fine tune its configuration
> though?
I don't think you can depend upon a package and tweak its
conffiles. It would be interesting to be able to do that and it
certainly makes sense from an object oriented inherit and modify
viewpo
Eric Winger wrote:
> Can't I even "Depend" on a package and then fine tune its configuration
> though?
I don't think you can depend upon a package and tweak its
conffiles. It would be interesting to be able to do that and it
certainly makes sense from an object oriented inherit and modify
viewpo
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
>> Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> > Can't I even "Depend" on a package and then fine tune its
>> > configuration though?
>>
>> Look at
>>
>> http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
> Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > Can't I even "Depend" on a package and then fine tune its
> > configuration though?
>
> Look at
>
> http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt
>
> ,
> | Packages must not modify othe
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
>
>> This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
>> >I'm thinking there's got to be a "higher level" way of handling this
>> >type of scenario.
>>
>> Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a p
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
>> Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> > Can't I even "Depend" on a package and then fine tune its
>> > configuration though?
>>
>> Look at
>>
>> http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
> Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > Can't I even "Depend" on a package and then fine tune its
> > configuration though?
>
> Look at
>
> http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt
>
> ,
> | Packages must not modify othe
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
>
>> This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
>> >I'm thinking there's got to be a "higher level" way of handling this
>> >type of scenario.
>>
>> Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a p
Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
>I'm thinking there's got to be a "higher level" way of handling this
>type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the
same
time.
Can't I even "Depend" on a packag
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package
which
> replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
Dependency means that a package with a foobar script
depen
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package which
> replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
>
> The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
> sys
Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
>I'm thinking there's got to be a "higher level" way of handling this
>type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the
same
time.
Can't I even "Depend" on a pa
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package
which
> replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
Dependency means that a package with a foobar script
de
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
>I'm thinking there's got to be a "higher level" way of handling this
>type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the same
time.
Package management is a small part of configuration management, there are
defi
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package
> which replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
>
> The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
> systems, we want to have o
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package which
> replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
Dependency means that a package with a foobar script
depends on the foobar inter
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package which
> replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
>
> The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
> sys
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
>I'm thinking there's got to be a "higher level" way of handling this
>type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the same
time.
Package management is a small part of configuration management, there are
defi
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package
> which replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
>
> The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
> systems, we want to have o
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package which
> replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
> dependency)?"
Dependency means that a package with a foobar script
depends on the foobar inter
The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?"
The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
systems, we want to have our own little package, that "configures" the
auto
The question, basically is this: "How does one have a .deb package which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?"
The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
systems, we want to have our own little package, that "configures" the
aut
26 matches
Mail list logo
