On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > >> Of course this mean that you need to have
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > >> Of course this mean that you need to hav
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
> > without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
> > and upload that, please g
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
> > without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
> > and upload that, please
On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
> without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
> and upload that, please go ahead, it would be an NMU, i don't think
> there is problem with the si
On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
> without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
> and upload that, please go ahead, it would be an NMU, i don't think
> there is problem with the s
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
> > machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
> > to not been forced to
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
>
> [...]
>
>
> > After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> > autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
> >
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
> > machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
> > to not been forced t
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
>
> [...]
>
>
> > After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> > autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
> >
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > >> Of course this mean that you need to have
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> >> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> >> and this may be unwanted.
> >
> > N
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
>> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
>> and this may be unwanted.
>
> No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
> .changes back fo
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
> machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
> to not been forced to be connected for the whole build.
You should be able to build offline
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for signing on a local trusted machine.
--
Colin Wa
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > >> Of course this mean that you need to hav
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
>
[...]
> After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
> but the binary-all package is rather huge, and i have difficulties
> uploading it ri
Hello, ...
Since i am right now settled with expensive and limited bandwith, i
decided some time ago to do a source only upload of my packages (well i
uploaded the first one (-1) fully, but for the next ones, i tested them
on my system, and then built them with -S and uploaded only the
.diff.gz, .
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> >> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> >> and this may be unwanted.
> >
> >
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
>> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
>> and this may be unwanted.
>
> No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
> .changes back f
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
> machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
> to not been forced to be connected for the whole build.
You should be able to build offlin
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for signing on a local trusted machine.
--
Colin W
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
>
[...]
> After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
> but the binary-all package is rather huge, and i have difficulties
> uploading it r
Hello, ...
Since i am right now settled with expensive and limited bandwith, i
decided some time ago to do a source only upload of my packages (well i
uploaded the first one (-1) fully, but for the next ones, i tested them
on my system, and then built them with -S and uploaded only the
.diff.gz,
24 matches
Mail list logo
