Re: artifacts in upstream, re: pristine source

2017-05-16 Thread Wookey
On 2017-05-16 12:52 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > > > Regarding the "pristine source" requirement (i.e. no build artifacts) in the > > source archive: should the upstream tarball be imported to the upstream > > branch "as is", and the tar command

Re: artifacts in upstream, re: pristine source

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Smith
Sounds reasonable to me. Thank you. Brian T. Smith System Fabric Works Senior Technical Staff bsm...@systemfabricworks.com (512) 293-4472 GPG Key: B3C2C7B73BA3CD7F On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > > > Regarding the "pris

Re: artifacts in upstream, re: pristine source

2017-05-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > Regarding the "pristine source" requirement (i.e. no build artifacts) in the > source archive: should the upstream tarball be imported to the upstream > branch "as is", and the tar command for orig.tar.gz should be configured to > omit build a

artifacts in upstream, re: pristine source

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Smith
Greetings, Apologies in advance, because I am sure that this has already been answered in the group or in a doc. I've spent a good bit of time googling/searching about this and couldn't find a definitive answer. Regarding the "pristine source" requirement (i.e. no build artifacts) in the source a