Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Colin Watson
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing. > >what does "out of date" mean in this contest? It means that the most recent source version (in unstable) has not been built for

Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Colin Watson
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing. > >what does "out of date" mean in this contest? It means that the most recent source version (in unstable) has not been built for

Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable ok > If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing. what does "out of date" mean in this contest? Cheers -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Simon Richter
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that > isn't available on a architecture? If it doesn't exist on purpose (like the mbr package, which only makes sense on i386), no problem. If it doesn't compile, it won't get into

Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Colin Watson
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that >isn't available on a architecture? If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable breaks other packages on the missing architecture(s)). If it's out of

arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that isn't available on a architecture? Tnx, cheers. -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ# 33538863 Home Page: http://www.students.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro Undergraduate student of Computer Science @ University of Bo

Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable ok > If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing. what does "out of date" mean in this contest? Cheers -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Simon Richter
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that > isn't available on a architecture? If it doesn't exist on purpose (like the mbr package, which only makes sense on i386), no problem. If it doesn't compile, it won't get int

Re: arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Colin Watson
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that >isn't available on a architecture? If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable breaks other packages on the missing architecture(s)). If it's out of

arch disparity and freeze

2001-06-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that isn't available on a architecture? Tnx, cheers. -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ# 33538863 Home Page: http://www.students.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro Undergraduate student of Computer Science @ University of B