Re: apt-get: ftp vs. http

2005-03-09 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:22:46PM +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 09. Mär 2005, 09:38:33 +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > > > The `http' method seems to need a gzipped file > > > `Packages.gz'; the `ftp' method can be

Re: apt-get: ftp vs. http

2005-03-09 Thread Bertram Scharpf
Am Mittwoch, 09. Mär 2005, 09:38:33 +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > > The `http' method seems to need a gzipped file > > `Packages.gz'; the `ftp' method can be satisfied with a > > plain one. Not very nice. > > `gzip Packages` prod

Re: apt-get: ftp vs. http

2005-03-09 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Hi, > > > > >2. I installed the Debian files to > > > >`/home/ftp/pub/debian-private/pool/...'. Putting an FTP > > > >entry into `sources.list' and installing with > > > >`apt-get upgrade' leads to the above result. Bu

apt-get: ftp vs. http (was: My first package/Mutt patch)

2005-03-07 Thread Bertram Scharpf
Hi, Am Montag, 07. Mär 2005, 11:39:41 +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: > Please rise _one_ topic in E-mail. Sorry! That was no good idea. > > >2. I installed the Debian files to > > >`/home/ftp/pub/debian-private/pool/...'. Putting an FTP > > >entry into `sources.list' and installing with