Re: Re: a proposal to update the abcm2ps package

2018-12-18 Thread Patrice Duroux
Hi, Another point is that would it be better to separate /debian from the upstream sources, I mean that providing only in each debian branches the content of /debian directory and moreover having like 5 or 6 (experimental) branches for something like the following: wheezy (o-o-stable): 6.6.17-1 j

Re: a proposal to update the abcm2ps package

2018-12-17 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-12-14 13:01] Tong Sun > > part text/plain 310 > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:27 AM Patrice Duroux wrote: > > > And so here is the current work available at Salsa on my guest account: > > https://salsa.debian.org/Peutch-guest/abcm2ps > > I'm not an expert at all, but I

Re: Re: a proposal to update the abcm2ps package

2018-12-15 Thread Patrice Duroux
So I started to progress on that. Currently I think master=debian and now there is an upstream. For pristine-tar, I don't know yet. Also I have restarted the project using 'gbp import-dscs --debsnap' to keep more traces of the past. Thanks!

Re: a proposal to update the abcm2ps package

2018-12-14 Thread Tong Sun
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:27 AM Patrice Duroux wrote: > And so here is the current work available at Salsa on my guest account: > https://salsa.debian.org/Peutch-guest/abcm2ps I'm not an expert at all, but I think the project on Salsa should include 3 branches, including upstream, pristine-tar &

a proposal to update the abcm2ps package

2018-12-14 Thread Patrice Duroux
Hi, This is more an exercise to teach how to deal with Debian packaging and with Salsa. I am not yet in contact with its DM, Anselm Lingnau, and neither with the upstream authors. But being now more familiar with git and git-buildpackage (thanks Guido!), I have started to work on updating the abc