Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> However, this proves the value of having a designated OT list signficantly
> guys: Here is someone subscribed to the very mailing list that supposed to
> help him learn more about debian, who is currently powerless to avoid the
> OT spam that's coming along with it (and cu
On 2/26/07, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, this proves the value of having a designated OT list signficantly
guys: Here is someone subscribed to the very mailing list that supposed to
help him learn more about debian, who is currently powerless to avoid the OT
spam that's c
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> A list that the debian organization reccomends for new debian users to go
> to seek help should be as accomodating to that goal as possible, including,
> yes, adjusting it self to how everybody reads mail.
Nope. It should help people figure out a more efficient way
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I use mutt in non-threaded mode so I have no idea. :-)
> So the list should adjust itself to how you read mail?
A list that the debian organization reccomends for new debian users to go
to seek help should be as accomodating to that goal as possibl
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it's GREATLY increasing the noise:signal
> > ratio for people who don't know about "ignore thread" or other such things.
> > It doesn't bother me personally (like I said I've found some of the messages
> > in this thread quite interesting... and if I do
5 matches
Mail list logo