Re: Using stable as a Debian Package Maintainer

2014-03-02 Thread Wookey
+++ Jan Dittberner [2014-03-02 16:19 +0100]: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 04:11:58PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: > > hi, > > > > what is the consensus about using stable (s/testing/jessie/g in > > sources.list) for maintaining Debian packages (in conjunction with a sid > > VM or a chroot to make sure

Re: Using stable as a Debian Package Maintainer

2014-03-02 Thread Jan Dittberner
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 04:11:58PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: > hi, > > what is the consensus about using stable (s/testing/jessie/g in > sources.list) for maintaining Debian packages (in conjunction with a sid > VM or a chroot to make sure it always builds)? Packages targeted for sid must always

Using stable as a Debian Package Maintainer

2014-03-02 Thread Felix Natter
hi, what is the consensus about using stable (s/testing/jessie/g in sources.list) for maintaining Debian packages (in conjunction with a sid VM or a chroot to make sure it always builds)? The problem with testing is that I spend >2-3 hours a week backing up data, apt-get dist-upgrade and making s