Hi,
On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
> Yes. My question is, though, is it a good idea to run the one within
> the other? As I understand it, ‘piuparts’ does its work inside a
> chroot; is it advisable for that to happen while already inside
> ‘pbuilder’s existing chroot?
not really
Chow Loong Jin writes:
> I think you should look at the lintian hook example in
> /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples. That could possibly be copied and
> modified to use piuparts.
Yes. My question is, though, is it a good idea to run the one within
the other? As I understand it, ‘piuparts’ does it
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 11:32 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> I've been made aware of ‘piuparts’. Would it make sense to have a hook
> to run this command, on the newly-built package, inside the ‘pbuilder’
> chroot? How would such a hook program get access to the file name of
> the binary package?
I think
Ben Finney writes:
> Does it make sense to use a hook to install and remove the package
> [in a ‘pbuilder’ chroot] after it is built? The plus side is this
> would test that the {pre,post}{inst,rm} programs run successfully.
> What are the negatives of this approach?
I've been made aware of ‘piu
Howdy all,
I'm trying to make more use of ‘pbuilder’ hooks for automating the
testing of my packages.
Does it make sense to use a hook to install and remove the package
after it is built? The plus side is this would test that the
{pre,post}{inst,rm} programs run successfully. What are the negativ
5 matches
Mail list logo
