Re: Upstream web

hi, On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:02PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > You don't upload yourself, you get a DD to do it on your behalf. Basically, > you put the packages up somewhere (or offer to e-mail to interested parties, > if you have no webspace), and e-mail here saying "I'd like a sponsor f

Re: Upstream web

hi, On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:02PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > You don't upload yourself, you get a DD to do it on your behalf. Basically, > you put the packages up somewhere (or offer to e-mail to interested parties, > if you have no webspace), and e-mail here saying "I'd like a sponsor f

Re: Upstream web

On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:15:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > First a bug says: > * #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus > > I've checked the location, it's not there anymore. > Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive. > I have contacted the upstream a

Upstream web

I'm adopting fda package. I've checked the bugs and they are not difficult to solve but I need some 'answers'. First a bug says: * #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus I've checked the location, it's not there anymore. Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archi

Re: Upstream web

On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:15:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > First a bug says: > * #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus > > I've checked the location, it's not there anymore. > Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive. > I have contacted the upstream a

Upstream web

I'm adopting fda package. I've checked the bugs and they are not difficult to solve but I need some 'answers'. First a bug says: * #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus I've checked the location, it's not there anymore. Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive.