Well, I didn't thought this request will turn into this type of
discussion.
Anyway, just to add my point of view : I mostly agree with Neil
position, as most of uploads should go to experimental during the
freeze.
But, for this particular upload (and maybe some others), targeting
unstable is IMO
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:18:21 +
Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:08:32AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > Unstable has had to be all-but-closed as a technical step to solve a
> > social problem. Uploads should not be targeted at unstable simply
>
>
Hello Neil,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:08, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unstable is also "closed" so that other packages can migrate more
> easily. Uploads not related to Lenny should go into experimental. New
can you point to ufficial documentation stating this? (ok, it's a
joke, I
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:08:32AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Unstable has had to be all-but-closed as a technical step to solve a
> social problem. Uploads should not be targeted at unstable simply
I was not aware of this, where can I find more info about it?
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
PGP/G
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:26:55 +0900
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:26:34PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. a
> écrit :
> > On Wednesday 2008 December 10 17:07:06 Julien Lavergne wrote:
> > >- Since unstable is "frozen" for Lenny, I want to let the
> > >possibil
5 matches
Mail list logo
