Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:25:12 +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: > Le 2025-01-22 21:15, Phil Wyett a écrit : > > ratt need not be run against architecture 'all' packages, so for these > > it will > > be a 'N/A' result. > Java libraries are architecture:all, and some updates are breaking build

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-25 Thread Phil Wyett
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 11:02 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 3:47:56 AM MST Phil Wyett wrote: > > The biggest thing I have is time, the one thing others have a distinct lack > > of. A previous career has taken its toll on my spine with damage at the > > base > > and seve

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-25 Thread Phil Wyett
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 19:27 +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Hello, > > > * Debian testing on a i5-8265U, 32GB RAM, 1TB NVME laptop. > > * RHEL 9.x on a Ultra 7 155H, 32GB RAM, 1TB NVME laptop. This has a 100GB > >   Debian testing builder VM. Many other test VMs. > > That is certainly more than w

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-23 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 08:15:43PM +, Phil Wyett wrote: > ratt (“Rebuild All The Things!”) operates on a Debian .changes file of a just- > built package, identifies all reverse-build-dependencies and rebuilds them > with > the .debs from the .changes file. > > The intended use-case is, for ex

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-23 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Hello, > * Debian testing on a i5-8265U, 32GB RAM, 1TB NVME laptop. > * RHEL 9.x on a Ultra 7 155H, 32GB RAM, 1TB NVME laptop. This has a 100GB > Debian testing builder VM. Many other test VMs. That is certainly more than what I have at home. I hope it can handle it. Otherwise you are complete

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-23 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Thursday, January 23, 2025 3:47:56 AM MST Phil Wyett wrote: > The biggest thing I have is time, the one thing others have a distinct lack > of. A previous career has taken its toll on my spine with damage at the base > and sever damage at the top (neck). Surgeons will not operate as it could > m

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-23 Thread Phil Wyett
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 00:41 +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Hello, > > let me start thanking you for your work weeding the RFS bugs, it has been > really really useful. > > I've become a DD in the end of 2023 so it's still fresh in my mind the > frustration of getting something sponsored :D >

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-23 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
Le 2025-01-22 21:15, Phil Wyett a écrit : ratt (“Rebuild All The Things!”) operates on a Debian .changes file of a just- built package, identifies all reverse-build-dependencies and rebuilds them with the .debs from the .changes file. The intended use-case is, for example, to package a new s

Re: Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-22 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Hello, let me start thanking you for your work weeding the RFS bugs, it has been really really useful. I've become a DD in the end of 2023 so it's still fresh in my mind the frustration of getting something sponsored :D The description of ratt only mentions go, does it work/is it useful for ot

Thanks and Tail of the ratt - New test proposal

2025-01-22 Thread Phil Wyett
Hi all, With the enthusiasm of package submitters/maintainers and the increased support of Debian Maintainers and Debian Developers, the number of packages on Mentors is at a manageable level. For this I thank everyone involved and I hope we can get better in the future. I propose now we add a ne