On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:20:21PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Nope - if our X libs were built with DECnet support, their -dev
> should depend on the appropriate packages, not you. Anyway, there's no
> Debian GNU/Ultrix (yet).
Linux can support DECnet all by itself :-) .
--
"You grabbed my
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ¿Should I build-depend/suggest/whatever on dnet at all?
Nope - if our X libs were built with DECnet support, their -dev
should depend on the appropriate packages, not you. Anyway, there's no
Debian GNU/Ultrix (yet).
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP si
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:20:21PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Nope - if our X libs were built with DECnet support, their -dev
> should depend on the appropriate packages, not you. Anyway, there's no
> Debian GNU/Ultrix (yet).
Linux can support DECnet all by itself :-) .
--
"You grabbed m
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ¿Should I build-depend/suggest/whatever on dnet at all?
Nope - if our X libs were built with DECnet support, their -dev
should depend on the appropriate packages, not you. Anyway, there's no
Debian GNU/Ultrix (yet).
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP
There friends,
This a "just in case" question.
I am packaging fkiss (see #106140). It was finally released under GPL
(yeeha!).
I see that in configure, upstream checks:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] says this is needed for Ultrix, if the X
# libraries were built with DECnet support. And [EMAIL
There friends,
This a "just in case" question.
I am packaging fkiss (see #106140). It was finally released under GPL
(yeeha!).
I see that in configure, upstream checks:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] says this is needed for Ultrix, if the X
# libraries were built with DECnet support. And [EMAIL
6 matches
Mail list logo