Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for
> m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when it happens but the
> changes file still needs to be signed before the package is uploaded.
You guessed right, it seems: I looked in th
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for
> m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when it happens but the
> changes file still needs to be signed before the package is uploaded.
You guessed right, it seems: I looked in th
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:59:53PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote:
> which I don't understand since the m68k build log (as well as those for
> all other architectures) looks OK :
Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for
m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when
Hi,
My packages python2.{1,2,3}-xmms are not entering testing although they
have met (as far as I can see) all the required conditions for four days
now. The reason invoked on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pyxmms.html
is :
out of date on m68k: python2.1-xmms, python2.2-xmms, python2.3-xmms
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:59:53PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote:
> which I don't understand since the m68k build log (as well as those for
> all other architectures) looks OK :
Check the archive to see if the package has actually been uploaded for
m68k - the buildd web page reports the build when
Hi,
My packages python2.{1,2,3}-xmms are not entering testing although they
have met (as far as I can see) all the required conditions for four days
now. The reason invoked on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pyxmms.html
is :
out of date on m68k: python2.1-xmms, python2.2-xmms, python2.3-xmms
6 matches
Mail list logo