Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Sorry! I made a mistake, when sending out this mail. There has been an error, while updating the packages on my server. It is *now* updated. I'm really sorry for wasting your time :-( Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > Hi, > > Daniel Baumann wrote: >> as we are also distributing the source, not just the

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > >>> * debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright >>> holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and phpmailer is missing (and >>> likely also others, stopped after finding these two). >> Hmm. Do i really need to do this? Because my deb

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Hi, Daniel Baumann wrote: > as we are also distributing the source, not just the binaries, > you have to: > > * either write a complete debian/copyright file covering all code > shipped within the sources. Daniel, Thijs: thanks for clarification in this point. I have now uploaded another c

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > Hmm. Do i really need to do this? Because my debian/rules don't install > them, as i patched the sources (with patch 01 and 02) to use the debian > packages of them instead. I just did not want to change the orig tarball > for this. as we are also distributing the source

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi, >> * debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright >> holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and phpmailer is missing (and >> likely also others, stopped after finding these two). > > Hmm. Do i really need to do this? Because my debian/rules don't install > them, as

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Daniel Baumann wrote: > no, not all: > > * this: > [...] >should be this: > [...] oops, you got me! :-) Corrected. > * debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright > holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Hi Thijs, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> [...] > Good to see that Mantis is getting a new maintainer. :-) > Please note that there have been numerous security issues with Mantis in the > recent past. Yes i know that mantis has a bad security history. Anyway i prefer to stay on mantis instead of th

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > * the ones you mentioned - everything should be okay now no, not all: * this: ---snip--- Upstream URL: http://www.mantisbugtracker.com ---snap--- should be this: ---snip--- Homepage: http://www.mantisbugtracker.com ---snap--- * debian/copyright is incompl

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Michal Čihař
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:46:44 +0100 Patrick Schönfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Michal Čihař wrote: > > More important is that it should point to > > http://www.mantisbugtracker.com/ > > why this? It seems as it would make no difference. See http://www.mantisbugtracker.com/index.php?f

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Hi Daniel, i have just finished my work on the package. My changes are: * the ones you mentioned - everything should be okay now * (re)added a debian/po directory and template files for translators * Changed Upstream URL to mantisbugtracking.com as Michael told me Incoming queue of m.d.o is stil

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Hi, Michal Čihař wrote: > More important is that it should point to > http://www.mantisbugtracker.com/ why this? It seems as it would make no difference. Greets Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:59:06 +0100 Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ---snip--- > Upstream URL: http://www.mantisbt.org > ---snap--- > > should be this: > > ---snip--- > Homepage: http://www.matisbt.org > ---snap--- More important is that it should point to http://www.manti

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Patrick Schönfeld wrote: >> You mentioned that it does not make much sense to use a patch system and >> modifying checkin.php directly. Normally, i agree, but then i will have >> to add a lintian override to my package, because to remove the change >> and instead add it as a

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > You mentioned that it does not make much sense to use a patch system and > modifying checkin.php directly. Normally, i agree, but then i will have > to add a lintian override to my package, because to remove the change > and instead add it as a patch does lead into an lin

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-29 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Good Morning Daniel, Daniel Baumann wrote: > schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote: >> http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis-1.0.6.tar.gz > > the patches need to be -p1, not -p0. that's all :) well that did what it should did. Another problem: You mentioned that it does not make much s

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote: > http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis-1.0.6.tar.gz the patches need to be -p1, not -p0. that's all :) -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello Patrick, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6-1 of the > package "mantis". Package is orphaned, i am the adopter of this package. > > It builds these arch-independent packages: > mantis - web-based bug tracking system Good to see that Mantis is getting a new maintainer.

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread schönfeld / in-medias-res
Daniel Baumann schrieb: schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote: Well now it does not run. Instead it says: can i see your sources? Here you are: http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis-1.0.6.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote: > Well now it does not run. Instead it says: can i see your sources? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread schönfeld / in-medias-res
Hi there, i have removed the targets from the makefile and instead added a line: include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make Also i modified (one of) the patches in this kind: 1. Remove the inclusion of DPATCH and the exit line 2. Changed shebang to run /bin/sh with /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run Wel

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > For some reason this failed in this package ago for one of the patches, > which was stated not to be found. Well, I've changed much since then, > maybe it will work as supposed now. try it, if it doesn't work out, i'll help. > It does provide the -patch/-unpatch argumen

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Hi Daniel, thanks for your quick response. Most of the things i will change until tomorrow, but there are a few questions/comments. Daniel Baumann schrieb: > Patrick Schönfeld wrote: >> http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc > > * if you're including the dpatch.make i

Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc you're using patches, nevertheless you're modifying core/checkin.php, is this intentional? * NEWS: don't use two (or more) empty lines as seperator, one is just enough. * README.LDAP: remove the u

Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)

2006-11-28 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6-1 of the package "mantis". Package is orphaned, i am the adopter of this package. It builds these arch-independent packages: mantis - web-based bug tracking system The package is