Phil Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I have a package with fixes that I think may be worthy of going into a
> stable point release, do I
> - just upload it to proposed-updates (by setting the distribution to
>stable in the changelog) and assume that if it is not worthy, it will
>s
Hi all,
If I have a package with fixes that I think may be worthy of going into a
stable point release, do I
- just upload it to proposed-updates (by setting the distribution to
stable in the changelog) and assume that if it is not worthy, it will
simply be ignored/rejected;
- email the st
Phil Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I have a package with fixes that I think may be worthy of going into a
> stable point release, do I
> - just upload it to proposed-updates (by setting the distribution to
>stable in the changelog) and assume that if it is not worthy, it will
>s
Hi all,
If I have a package with fixes that I think may be worthy of going into a
stable point release, do I
- just upload it to proposed-updates (by setting the distribution to
stable in the changelog) and assume that if it is not worthy, it will
simply be ignored/rejected;
- email the st
Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
> My question is now: is the stuff in stable-updates ever going to be
> integrated into the stable distribution? If so, what's the timescale
> on that? Also, are those in charge of the official CD images going to
> be putting the stuff in stable
release I get a bug report about the problems
upgrading from bo, investigate them, and fix them. I submit a new
fvwm95 for stable and it gets put into stable-updates.
Fair enough.
My question is now: is the stuff in stable-updates ever going to be
integrated into the stable distribution? If so,
6 matches
Mail list logo
